Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 722 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire van den heuvel michiel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights van den heuvel michiel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the van den heuvel michiel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve van den heuvel michiel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:25 | 55:28 to 52:03 | 78.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:33 | 08:01 to 07:28 | 12.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 05:13 to 04:51 | 8.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:17 to 01:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:09 to 06:09 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:16 to 06:16 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:44 to 08:44 | 0.0% |
| van den heuvel michiel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:17 | 00:00 | 05:25 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:13 | 05:17 | 04:48 +00:25 | 05:25 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 10:30 | 06:02 -00:58 | 10:13 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 01:17 | 15:34 | 03:41 -02:24 | 16:15 -00:41 |
| Running 3 | 04:22 | 16:51 | 06:44 -02:22 | 19:56 -03:05 |
| Sled Pull | 06:09 | 21:13 | 06:34 -00:25 | 26:40 -05:27 |
| Running 4 | 03:57 | 27:22 | 06:43 -02:46 | 33:14 -05:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:01 | 31:19 | 07:39 +00:22 | 39:57 -08:38 |
| Running 5 | 03:38 | 39:20 | 07:03 -03:25 | 47:36 -08:16 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 42:58 | 05:22 -00:35 | 54:39 -11:41 |
| Running 6 | 03:10 | 47:45 | 06:51 -03:41 | 01:00:01 -12:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 50:55 | 02:44 -00:20 | 01:06:52 -15:57 |
| Running 7 | 04:55 | 53:19 | 06:50 -01:55 | 01:09:36 -16:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:16 | 58:14 | 07:01 -00:45 | 01:16:26 -18:12 |
| Running 8 | 07:08 | 01:04:30 | 08:21 -01:13 | 01:23:27 -18:57 |
| Wall Balls | 08:44 | 01:11:38 | 09:12 -00:28 | 01:31:48 -20:10 |
| Roxzone | 31:03 | 01:51:16 | 10:16 +20:47 | 01:51:16 |
Michiel's best running lap was impressive, completing it in 00:21:10. However, there were areas where he lost time, such as the Roxzone, Burpees Broad Jump, and Ski Erg segments.
In conclusion, Michiel van den Heuvel had a solid performance in the 2021 Amsterdam Hyrox race. To improve his performance, he should focus on reducing his transition time in the Roxzone, improving his power and endurance in the Burpees Broad Jump segment, and enhancing his technique and upper body strength on the Ski Erg. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, drills, and race strategies tailored to these areas of improvement will help him enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Giraud Gabriel | 2023 Paris | 01:51:46 | |
| De Roos Daniël | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:51:42 | |
| Giaretta Andrea | 2024 Milan | 01:50:50 | |
| Harter Kai | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:51:32 | |
| Alikadli Younis | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:51:29 | |
| Hattem Tim | 2024 Maastricht | 01:51:41 | |
| Lim Edward | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:50:50 | |
| Berthoud Olivier | 2023 Paris | 01:51:03 | |
| 남 경훈 | 2024 Incheon | 01:51:37 | |
| Murray Ronan | 2024 Madrid | 01:51:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
