Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kenny Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kenny Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kenny Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kenny Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:00 | 45:19 to 42:19 | 50.1% |
| Wall Balls | 02:06 | 08:20 to 06:14 | 35.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:28 | 04:53 to 04:25 | 7.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 05:10 to 04:57 | 3.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 05:21 to 05:09 | 3.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Kenny Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:13 | 00:00 | 04:42 -00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 04:13 | 04:28 +00:25 | 04:42 -00:29 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 09:06 | 05:02 +00:41 | 09:10 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 14:49 | 02:57 -00:46 | 14:12 +00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:40 | 17:00 | 05:28 +00:12 | 17:09 -00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 04:40 | 22:40 | 05:02 -00:22 | 22:37 +00:03 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 27:20 | 05:27 +00:25 | 27:39 -00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:21 | 33:12 | 05:25 -00:04 | 33:06 +00:06 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 38:33 | 05:38 +00:25 | 38:31 +00:02 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 44:36 | 04:52 -00:14 | 44:09 +00:27 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 49:14 | 05:30 +00:04 | 49:01 +00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 54:48 | 02:13 -00:35 | 54:31 +00:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 56:26 | 05:28 -00:05 | 56:44 -00:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:10 | 01:01:49 | 05:12 -00:02 | 01:02:12 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:54 | 01:06:59 | 06:06 +00:48 | 01:07:24 -00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 08:20 | 01:13:53 | 06:38 +01:42 | 01:13:30 +00:23 |
| Roxzone | 05:05 | 01:27:09 | 07:01 -01:56 | 01:27:09 |
Kevin Kenny delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 37% overall and in the top 38% within his age group. His overall time was 01:27:09. Analyzing his pacing strategy, it appears that Kevin started the race strong, as evidenced by his performance on Running 1, but gradually slowed down, particularly in the later running segments. This suggests a potential issue with endurance or fatigue management over the course of the event. Kevin exhibits a hybrid profile, with strengths in both running and strength-related exercises, but he could benefit from improving his overall running performance, given that his total running time was 01:36 slower than average. His transitions in the Roxzone were notably efficient, indicating good overall fitness and transition skills.
By focusing on these targeted improvements and strategies, Kevin can enhance his performance and gain a competitive edge in future Hyrox events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Prentice Kevin | 2024 Madrid | 01:26:47 | |
| Gibney Kevin | 2022 London | 01:27:32 | |
| Singh Bikram | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:46 | |
| Van Santen Elric | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:27:05 | |
| Sanchez Listan Juan | 2023 Madrid | 01:26:53 | |
| Moyne Mathieu | 2024 Paris | 01:27:18 | |
| Mourette Adrien | 2024 Paris | 01:27:08 | |
| Cuenca Sanchez Samuel | 2023 Malaga | 01:26:52 | |
| Green Johnny | 2022 London | 01:27:04 | |
| Chaves Paulo | 2024 Madrid | 01:27:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:27:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
