Regenkiewicz Anita Performance Analysis

Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Essen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 248 similar athletes.

Race Summary

This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.

Running

We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.

Workouts

We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.

Pacing Quality

This section showcases the entire Regenkiewicz Anita's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average. It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Regenkiewicz Anita's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.

Spread of Splits Time

This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Regenkiewicz Anita's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement. This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.

Improvement Plan

Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Regenkiewicz Anita's time.

The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.

A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.

For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.

Splits	Potential Improvement	Time	Focus During Training
Sled Pull	02:00	07:41 to 05:41	32.3%
Wall Balls	01:29	07:08 to 05:39	24.0%
Burpees Broad Jump	01:27	06:01 to 04:34	23.5%
Ski Erg	00:30	05:11 to 04:41	8.1%
Rowing	00:18	05:13 to 04:55	4.9%
Farmers Carry	00:14	02:37 to 02:23	3.8%
Sled Push	00:13	03:45 to 03:32	3.5%
Sandbag Lunges	00:00	03:57 to 03:57	0.0%
Run Total	00:00	38:31 to 38:31	0.0%

A word from your coach

Loading...

Analysing the result... Wait a few second...

Race History

Explore your race history splits in detail below. The interactive chart provides an easy way to analyze your performance by highlighting faster and slower times across each split. This tool is designed to help you identify trends, track improvements, and refine your strategy for future races.

Ready to conquer your next race?

Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.

Pace Calculator