Cook Glen Performance Analysis

Dive into the performance of this athlete for 2024 Poznan with this analyzer. We look at the performance of similar athletes to assess where are the weakness and the strengths of this athlete. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 266 similar athletes.

When comparing two athletes, remember that differing race track layouts can affect their running and roxzone times. The best strategy is to compare athletes who have raced in the same event.

Back to Cook Glen view Cook Glen's full profile

Season 7 2024 Poznan (1302) HYROX (248) Cook Glen

GBR M 30-34 #92010 01:02:08 8th in AG | Top 3.2% 27th | Top 2.6%

Performance Highlights

Workout Total 27:12 +01:03
Running Total 30:16 -01:46
Roxzone 04:44 +00:47
Average Lap 03:47 -00:13
Best Lap 03:29 -00:06

Running

We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. Each segment’s time difference is highlighted: green for faster segments, red for slower ones. This gives a clear view of strengths and areas to improve, tailored to relevant performance peers.

Workouts

We break down workout times by comparing the athlete’s performance to others with matching finish times. Each workout segment displays a time difference: green for quicker and red for slower, offering a targeted look at competitive strengths and areas to refine.

Pacing Quality

This section showcases the entire Cook Glen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average. It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cook Glen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast (line below 0) or too slow (line above 0), guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.

Spread of Splits Time

This box plot illustrates the spread of splits for similar athletes, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cook Glen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement. The chart include Top 10%, 25%, Median, and Bottom 25%, 10% of the distribution.

Improvement Plan

Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. We looked at the results of similar athletes to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cook Glen's time.

The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.

A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.

Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.

Station Percentile Rank Potential Improvement Focus During Training
Burpees Broad Jump 94 01:08 27.2%
Roxzone 70 01:04 25.6%
Wall Balls 77 00:53 21.2%
Sandbag Lunges 89 00:43 17.2%
Rowing 55 00:08 3.2%
Farmers Carry 46 00:08 3.2%
Ski Erg 47 00:06 2.4%
Sled Push 8 00:00 0.0%
Sled Pull 9 00:00 0.0%
Run Total 8 00:00 0.0%

Progression Chart

Splits Time

Splits Time Time from Similar Athletes
Glen Glen Total Time Average Total Time
Running 1 04:02 πŸ† 04:03 04:02 03:32 +00:30 03:32 +00:30
Ski Erg 04:02 πŸ† 04:03 08:04 04:01 +00:01 07:33 +00:31
Running 2 03:29 πŸ† 03:35 11:33 03:50 -00:21 11:23 +00:10
Sled Push 01:45 πŸ† 03:35 13:18 02:11 -00:26 13:34 -00:16
Running 3 03:42 πŸ† 04:16 17:00 04:03 -00:21 17:37 -00:37
Sled Pull 02:53 πŸ† 05:54 19:53 03:22 -00:29 20:59 -01:06
Running 4 03:42 πŸ† 04:07 23:35 04:03 -00:21 25:02 -01:27
Burpees Broad Jump 04:04 03:21 πŸ† 27:39 03:14 +00:50 28:16 -00:37
Running 5 03:52 πŸ† 04:12 31:31 04:08 -00:16 32:24 -00:53
Rowing 04:19 04:17 πŸ† 35:50 04:15 +00:04 36:39 -00:49
Running 6 03:44 πŸ† 04:08 39:34 04:04 -00:20 40:43 -01:09
Farmers Carry 01:35 πŸ† 01:49 41:09 01:35 +00:00 42:18 -01:09
Running 7 03:46 πŸ† 04:03 44:55 04:05 -00:19 46:23 -01:28
Sandbag Lunges 03:54 03:43 πŸ† 48:49 03:22 +00:32 49:45 -00:56
Running 8 04:03 πŸ† 04:35 52:52 04:17 -00:14 54:02 -01:10
Wall Balls 04:40 πŸ† 06:13 57:32 04:09 +00:31 58:11 -00:39
Roxzone 04:44 πŸ† 05:29 01:02:08 03:57 +00:47 01:02:08

Comparing with 266 athletes

A word from your coach
Loading...

Loading...
Analysing the result... Wait a few second...
Similar Athletes
Mcalary Steven 2024 Malaga 01:01:45 Compare
Bailey Luke 2024 Malaga 01:02:13 Compare
Corlett Adam 2022 London 01:02:13 Compare
Moumen Jaafar 2022 Essen 01:01:44 Compare
Axelsen AndrΓ© 2022 Essen 01:02:23 Compare
Barreto Nuno 2022 Maastricht 01:02:21 Compare
Schaller Moritz 2022 MΓΌnchen 01:02:26 Compare
Legatzki Frederic 2023 Hannover 01:01:59 Compare
Franzke Charles 2021 Berlin 01:01:39 Compare
Goetz Pascal 2023 Hong Kong 01:02:26 Compare

Measure Your Performance Against Top Athletes

Other Results from this athlete
2024 Sports Direct HYROX London 01:03:55 Compare
2024 Copenhagen 01:11:15 Compare
2024 Malaga 01:11:15 Compare

Ready to conquer your next race?

Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.

Pace Calculator

Share Your Result on Instagram

We've generated the perfect instagram story for you. Don't forget to tag us @roxcoach and redirect to your result page.

Download

Embrace Your Post-Race Recovery Journey

Discover the art of recovery with our expert tips. Tailored for Hyrox athletes, our guide ensures you rejuvenate effectively and return stronger for your next challenge.

Start My Recovery Plan