Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 236 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Vermunt Skip's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Vermunt Skip's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Vermunt Skip's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Vermunt Skip's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 13:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 11:26 | 01:07:49 to 56:23 | 82.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:15 | 09:01 to 07:46 | 9.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:09 | 09:35 to 08:26 | 8.2% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:41 to 05:34 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:53 to 02:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:47 to 08:47 | 0.0% |
| Vermunt Skip | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:50 | 00:00 | 05:52 +01:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 07:50 | 04:58 -00:12 | 05:52 +01:58 |
| Running 2 | 08:45 | 12:36 | 06:42 +02:03 | 10:50 +01:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 21:21 | 03:59 -01:06 | 17:32 +03:49 |
| Running 3 | 08:18 | 24:14 | 07:34 +00:44 | 21:31 +02:43 |
| Sled Pull | 04:51 | 32:32 | 07:12 -02:21 | 29:05 +03:27 |
| Running 4 | 07:57 | 37:23 | 07:32 +00:25 | 36:17 +01:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:35 | 45:20 | 08:57 +00:38 | 43:49 +01:31 |
| Running 5 | 08:13 | 54:55 | 08:03 +00:10 | 52:46 +02:09 |
| Rowing | 05:41 | 01:03:08 | 05:40 +00:01 | 01:00:49 +02:19 |
| Running 6 | 07:56 | 01:08:49 | 07:45 +00:11 | 01:06:29 +02:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 01:16:45 | 03:04 -00:36 | 01:14:14 +02:31 |
| Running 7 | 07:59 | 01:19:13 | 07:46 +00:13 | 01:17:18 +01:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:01 | 01:27:12 | 08:12 +00:49 | 01:25:04 +02:08 |
| Running 8 | 10:54 | 01:36:13 | 09:55 +00:59 | 01:33:16 +02:57 |
| Wall Balls | 08:47 | 01:47:07 | 10:36 -01:49 | 01:43:11 +03:56 |
| Roxzone | 09:32 | 02:05:17 | 11:30 -01:58 | 02:05:17 |
Skip Vermunt's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race was commendable, with a final rank in the top 69% both overall and within his age group. His overall time was 02:05:17, indicating a solid effort. A key highlight was his strength-based segments, particularly the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where he significantly outperformed the average. However, his total running time was 06:00 slower than the average, suggesting that running endurance and speed need attention. The Roxzone transition time was efficient, indicating good recovery and transition capability. Skip's pacing was consistent, with no significant early-race burnout, but overall, his performance leans more towards being strength-oriented rather than a balanced hybrid, given the slower running total compared to the average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tan Wei Wen | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:04:50 | |
| Webb Russell | 2023 Dallas | 02:05:38 | |
| Büch Michael | 2024 Stuttgart | 02:04:56 | |
| Brownfield Darryn | 2023 Birmingham | 02:04:56 | |
| Tan Chor Seng | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:05:10 | |
| Dow James | 2024 Houston | 02:05:06 | |
| Gavin Joe | 2023 London | 02:05:32 | |
| Holzer Manuel | 2019 Wien | 02:04:52 | |
| Watkin David | 2022 Manchester | 02:04:55 | |
| Koekemoer Wesley | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:05:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
