Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Hees Fedde's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Hees Fedde's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Hees Fedde's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Hees Fedde's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:01 | 52:19 to 46:18 | 88.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:37 | 05:13 to 04:36 | 9.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 06:14 to 06:06 | 2.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:03 to 03:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:50 to 05:50 | 0.0% |
| Van Hees Fedde | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:13 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:13 | 04:13 | 04:37 +00:36 | 05:00 -00:47 |
| Running 2 | 06:25 | 09:26 | 05:25 +01:00 | 09:37 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 15:51 | 03:14 -00:11 | 15:02 +00:49 |
| Running 3 | 07:02 | 18:54 | 05:56 +01:06 | 18:16 +00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 04:59 | 25:56 | 05:38 -00:39 | 24:12 +01:44 |
| Running 4 | 06:54 | 30:55 | 05:55 +00:59 | 29:50 +01:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:14 | 37:49 | 06:21 -00:07 | 35:45 +02:04 |
| Running 5 | 07:11 | 44:03 | 06:08 +01:03 | 42:06 +01:57 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 51:14 | 05:03 -00:18 | 48:14 +03:00 |
| Running 6 | 06:57 | 55:59 | 05:58 +00:59 | 53:17 +02:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 01:02:56 | 02:26 -00:11 | 59:15 +03:41 |
| Running 7 | 06:34 | 01:05:11 | 05:56 +00:38 | 01:01:41 +03:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:33 | 01:11:45 | 05:55 -01:22 | 01:07:37 +04:08 |
| Running 8 | 07:08 | 01:16:18 | 06:49 +00:19 | 01:13:32 +02:46 |
| Wall Balls | 05:50 | 01:23:26 | 07:42 -01:52 | 01:20:21 +03:05 |
| Roxzone | 07:09 | 01:36:16 | 08:13 -01:04 | 01:36:16 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Fedde's strongest segment was the Sled Pull, where he performed 00:59 faster than the average. He also performed well in the Running 1 segment, finishing 00:33 faster than average. On the other hand, his weakest segments were Running 2, Running 5, Running 3, Running 6, Running 4, Ski Erg, Running 7, Burpees Broad Jump, and Running 8, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
Overall, Fedde Van Hees performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, he can address his weaknesses and optimize his overall race performance. With proper training and race strategies, Fedde has the potential to achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidler Bruce | 2022 Manchester | 01:36:25 | |
| Burton Gary | 2023 Sydney | 01:36:35 | |
| Trouerbach Sven | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:36:20 | |
| Ware Zach | 2022 New York | 01:35:59 | |
| Fink Andrew | 2019 New York | 01:36:00 | |
| Landicho Robert | 2024 Dubai | 01:35:46 | |
| Cree David | 2023 London | 01:36:24 | |
| Hartwig Joel | 2023 Hamburg | 01:36:14 | |
| Finneran Jackson | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:11 | |
| Orefice Francesco | 2024 Milan | 01:36:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:28:30 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:33:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
