Regenkiewicz Anita Performance Analysis

Dive into the performance of this athlete for 2019 Oberhausen with this analyzer. We look at the performance of similar athletes to assess where are the weakness and the strengths of this athlete. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 528 similar athletes.

When comparing two athletes, remember that differing race track layouts can affect their running and roxzone times. The best strategy is to compare athletes who have raced in the same event.

Back to Regenkiewicz Anita view Bonacker Lena's full profile

Season 1 2019 Oberhausen (271) HYROX (41) Regenkiewicz Anita

GER W 25-29 #81024 01:14:37 πŸ₯‡ in AG | Top 2.4% πŸ₯‰ | Top 1.4%

Performance Highlights

Workout Total 31:01 +00:34
Running Total 39:53 +00:49
Roxzone 03:47 -01:13
Average Lap 04:59 +00:06
Best Lap 04:14 -00:04

Running

We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. Each segment’s time difference is highlighted: green for faster segments, red for slower ones. This gives a clear view of strengths and areas to improve, tailored to relevant performance peers.

Workouts

We break down workout times by comparing the athlete’s performance to others with matching finish times. Each workout segment displays a time difference: green for quicker and red for slower, offering a targeted look at competitive strengths and areas to refine.

Pacing Quality

This section showcases the entire Regenkiewicz Anita's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average. It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Regenkiewicz Anita's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast (line below 0) or too slow (line above 0), guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.

Spread of Splits Time

This box plot illustrates the spread of splits for similar athletes, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Regenkiewicz Anita's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement. The chart include Top 10%, 25%, Median, and Bottom 25%, 10% of the distribution.

Improvement Plan

Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. We looked at the results of similar athletes to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Regenkiewicz Anita's time.

The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.

A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.

Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.

Station Percentile Rank Potential Improvement Focus During Training
Run Total 65 01:54 36.4%
Burpees Broad Jump 90 01:22 26.2%
Sled Pull 70 00:43 13.7%
Ski Erg 92 00:30 9.6%
Wall Balls 53 00:23 7.3%
Farmers Carry 74 00:18 5.8%
Rowing 37 00:03 1.0%
Sled Push 17 00:00 0.0%
Sandbag Lunges 5 00:00 0.0%
Roxzone 7 00:00 0.0%

Progression Chart

Splits Time

Splits Time Time from Similar Athletes
Anita Lena Total Time Average Total Time
Running 1 04:14 04:05 πŸ† 04:14 04:24 -00:10 04:24 -00:10
Ski Erg 05:08 04:52 πŸ† 09:22 04:47 +00:21 09:11 +00:11
Running 2 04:51 04:48 πŸ† 14:13 04:42 +00:09 13:53 +00:20
Sled Push 01:58 01:41 πŸ† 16:11 02:19 -00:21 16:12 -00:01
Running 3 05:13 04:55 πŸ† 21:24 04:57 +00:16 21:09 +00:15
Sled Pull 04:52 04:47 πŸ† 26:16 04:35 +00:17 25:44 +00:32
Running 4 05:12 05:04 πŸ† 31:28 04:58 +00:14 30:42 +00:46
Burpees Broad Jump 05:27 04:07 πŸ† 36:55 04:31 +00:56 35:13 +01:42
Running 5 05:05 πŸ† 05:17 42:00 05:02 +00:03 40:15 +01:45
Rowing 04:55 04:47 πŸ† 46:55 04:59 -00:04 45:14 +01:41
Running 6 05:15 05:04 πŸ† 52:10 04:59 +00:16 50:13 +01:57
Farmers Carry 02:06 02:06 54:16 01:57 +00:09 52:10 +02:06
Running 7 05:04 πŸ† 05:09 59:20 04:57 +00:07 57:07 +02:13
Sandbag Lunges 03:05 03:03 πŸ† 01:02:25 03:46 -00:41 01:00:53 +01:32
Running 8 05:03 πŸ† 05:35 01:07:28 05:11 -00:08 01:06:04 +01:24
Wall Balls 03:30 03:22 πŸ† 01:10:58 03:33 -00:03 01:09:37 +01:21
Roxzone 03:47 πŸ† 05:31 01:14:37 05:00 -01:13 01:14:37

Comparing with 528 athletes

A word from your coach
Loading...

Loading...
Analysing the result... Wait a few second...
Similar Athletes
Burke Kelly 2021 New York 01:14:07 Compare
Wilson Kathleen 2022 London 01:14:07 Compare
Schulze Isabell 2023 Frankfurt 01:14:07 Compare
Bonacker Lena 2023 Frankfurt 01:14:07 Compare
Street Megan 2023 London 01:14:07 Compare
Van Heerden Diana 2023 London 01:14:07 Compare
Beyer Merle 2021 Hamburg 01:14:07 Compare
Heemskerk Daphne 2023 Maastricht European Championships 01:14:07 Compare
Folscheid Charlotte 2024 Turin 01:14:07 Compare
Main Sophie 2024 Berlin 01:14:07 Compare

Measure Your Performance Against Top Athletes

Other Results from this athlete
2022 Essen 01:25:01 Compare
2021 Berlin 01:26:47 Compare
2023 Stuttgart 01:19:40 Compare
2019 Essen 01:24:25 Compare
WorldChampionship - Leipzig 01:21:39 Compare
2020 Hannover 01:35:55 Compare

Ready to conquer your next race?

Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.

Pace Calculator

Share Your Result on Instagram

We've generated the perfect instagram story for you. Don't forget to tag us @roxcoach and redirect to your result page.

Download

Embrace Your Post-Race Recovery Journey

Discover the art of recovery with our expert tips. Tailored for Hyrox athletes, our guide ensures you rejuvenate effectively and return stronger for your next challenge.

Start My Recovery Plan