Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hallett Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hallett Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hallett Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hallett Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:44 | 07:35 to 05:51 | 39.1% |
| Run Total | 01:12 | 46:27 to 45:15 | 27.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 | 06:12 to 05:30 | 15.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 05:51 to 05:17 | 12.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:32 to 02:18 | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:03 to 03:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:00 to 07:00 | 0.0% |
| Hallett Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:15 | 00:00 | 04:53 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 05:15 | 04:33 -00:17 | 04:53 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 09:31 | 05:21 +00:00 | 09:26 +00:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 14:52 | 03:12 -00:09 | 14:47 +00:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 17:55 | 05:51 -00:10 | 17:59 -00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:51 | 23:36 | 05:29 +00:22 | 23:50 -00:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 29:27 | 05:51 -00:04 | 29:19 +00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:35 | 35:14 | 06:07 +01:28 | 35:10 +00:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 42:49 | 06:03 -00:11 | 41:17 +01:32 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 48:41 | 05:00 -00:22 | 47:20 +01:21 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 53:19 | 05:53 +00:03 | 52:20 +00:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 59:15 | 02:23 +00:09 | 58:13 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:54 | 01:01:47 | 05:51 +00:03 | 01:00:36 +01:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:12 | 01:07:41 | 05:42 +00:30 | 01:06:27 +01:14 |
| Running 8 | 06:44 | 01:13:53 | 06:41 +00:03 | 01:12:09 +01:44 |
| Wall Balls | 07:00 | 01:20:37 | 07:23 -00:23 | 01:18:50 +01:47 |
| Roxzone | 06:34 | 01:34:05 | 07:52 -01:18 | 01:34:05 |
Based on the splits analysis, Nathan's strongest segments were the Ski Erg and Sled Push, where he was faster than the average time by 17 and 26 seconds, respectively. This suggests that he has good upper body strength and power. His Best Running Lap of 00:05:15 was also impressive and indicates that he has good speed and endurance.
However, there were several segments where Nathan lost significant time compared to the average. The Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, and Running 1 were particularly challenging for him, with times that were 01:49, 00:33, and 00:31 slower than average, respectively. These segments should be a focus for improvement in his training.
By addressing the areas for improvement, focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, and implementing effective race strategies, Nathan can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. With continued dedication and training, he has the potential to achieve even better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kramer Rick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:33:41 | |
| Kuich Krzysztof | 2024 Poznan | 01:34:29 | |
| Allali Bari | 2023 Barcelona | 01:33:46 | |
| Cervantes Carlos | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:33:38 | |
| Van Hoeckel Anthony | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:33:56 | |
| Lloyd Davies Matthew | 2022 London | 01:33:57 | |
| Brooks Chris | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:33:41 | |
| Clifton Topias | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:34 | |
| Deasy Eoghan | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:34:27 | |
| Dino Steven Andrew Sebastian | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:34:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:41:03 | |
| 2023 London | 01:49:45 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
