Tuck Paul Performance Analysis

Dive into the performance of this athlete for 2024 Poznan with this analyzer. We look at the performance of similar athletes to assess where are the weakness and the strengths of this athlete. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.

When comparing two athletes, remember that differing race track layouts can affect their running and roxzone times. The best strategy is to compare athletes who have raced in the same event.

Back to Tuck Paul view Mรผller Frank's full profile

Season 7 2024 Poznan (1302) HYROX (14) Tuck Paul

GBR M 55-59 #101016 01:25:06 ๐Ÿฅ‰ in AG | Top 21.4% 382nd | Top 36.8%

Performance Highlights

Workout Total 40:51 +04:58
Running Total 37:41 -04:55
Roxzone 06:37 -00:01
Average Lap 04:43 -00:36
Best Lap 04:28 -00:03

Running

We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. Each segmentโ€™s time difference is highlighted: green for faster segments, red for slower ones. This gives a clear view of strengths and areas to improve, tailored to relevant performance peers.

Workouts

We break down workout times by comparing the athleteโ€™s performance to others with matching finish times. Each workout segment displays a time difference: green for quicker and red for slower, offering a targeted look at competitive strengths and areas to refine.

Pacing Quality

This section showcases the entire Tuck Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average. It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tuck Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast (line below 0) or too slow (line above 0), guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.

Spread of Splits Time

This box plot illustrates the spread of splits for similar athletes, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tuck Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement. The chart include Top 10%, 25%, Median, and Bottom 25%, 10% of the distribution.

Improvement Plan

Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. We looked at the results of similar athletes to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tuck Paul's time.

The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.

A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.

Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.

Station Percentile Rank Potential Improvement Focus During Training
Wall Balls 100 05:07 48.8%
Burpees Broad Jump 98 02:36 24.8%
Sandbag Lunges 78 01:04 10.2%
Roxzone 52 01:03 10.0%
Farmers Carry 68 00:24 3.8%
Sled Push 34 00:09 1.4%
Ski Erg 41 00:06 1.0%
Sled Pull 7 00:00 0.0%
Rowing 23 00:00 0.0%
Run Total 2 00:00 0.0%

Progression Chart

Splits Time

Splits Time Time from Similar Athletes
Paul Frank Total Time Average Total Time
Running 1 05:08 04:25 ๐Ÿ† 05:08 04:33 +00:35 04:33 +00:35
Ski Erg 04:21 04:04 ๐Ÿ† 09:29 04:25 -00:04 08:58 +00:31
Running 2 04:28 ๐Ÿ† 05:21 13:57 04:58 -00:30 13:56 +00:01
Sled Push 02:39 ๐Ÿ† 02:46 16:36 02:52 -00:13 16:48 -00:12
Running 3 04:35 ๐Ÿ† 05:47 21:11 05:24 -00:49 22:12 -01:01
Sled Pull 03:41 ๐Ÿ† 04:04 24:52 04:51 -01:10 27:03 -02:11
Running 4 04:33 ๐Ÿ† 05:40 29:25 05:23 -00:50 32:26 -03:01
Burpees Broad Jump 07:05 05:14 ๐Ÿ† 36:30 05:16 +01:49 37:42 -01:12
Running 5 04:37 ๐Ÿ† 05:53 41:07 05:32 -00:55 43:14 -02:07
Rowing 04:35 04:33 ๐Ÿ† 45:42 04:48 -00:13 48:02 -02:20
Running 6 04:39 ๐Ÿ† 05:52 50:21 05:24 -00:45 53:26 -03:05
Farmers Carry 02:19 01:58 ๐Ÿ† 52:40 02:10 +00:09 55:36 -02:56
Running 7 04:33 ๐Ÿ† 05:46 57:13 05:23 -00:50 01:00:59 -03:46
Sandbag Lunges 05:33 04:48 ๐Ÿ† 01:02:46 05:04 +00:29 01:06:03 -03:17
Running 8 05:13 ๐Ÿ† 06:54 01:07:59 05:58 -00:45 01:12:01 -04:02
Wall Balls 10:38 05:00 ๐Ÿ† 01:18:37 06:27 +04:11 01:18:28 +00:09
Roxzone 06:37 ๐Ÿ† 06:38 01:25:06 06:38 -00:01 01:25:06

Comparing with 1000 athletes

A word from your coach
Loading...

Loading...
Analysing the result... Wait a few second...
Similar Athletes
Lenz Ronny 2018 Stuttgart 01:24:36 Compare
Schmidt Mike 2018 Hamburg 01:24:36 Compare
Evans Matthew 2022 London 01:24:36 Compare
Hitos Valdes Guillermo 2022 Mรผnchen 01:24:36 Compare
Mokros Alexander 2021 Berlin 01:24:36 Compare
Howell Allan 2023 Houston 01:24:36 Compare
Mรผller Frank 2023 Stuttgart 01:24:36 Compare
Taitt Stephen 2023 Manchester 01:24:36 Compare
Corry Jack 2022 London 01:24:36 Compare
Mohacsi Tom 2023 Chicago 01:24:36 Compare

Measure Your Performance Against Top Athletes

Other Results from this athlete
2024 Birmingham 01:31:53 Compare

Ready to conquer your next race?

Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.

Pace Calculator

Share Your Result on Instagram

We've generated the perfect instagram story for you. Don't forget to tag us @roxcoach and redirect to your result page.

Download

Embrace Your Post-Race Recovery Journey

Discover the art of recovery with our expert tips. Tailored for Hyrox athletes, our guide ensures you rejuvenate effectively and return stronger for your next challenge.

Start My Recovery Plan