Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Widmer Emilie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Widmer Emilie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Widmer Emilie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Widmer Emilie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:52 | 42:50 to 40:58 | 34.4% |
| Sled Push | 01:27 | 03:38 to 02:11 | 26.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:14 | 05:51 to 04:37 | 22.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:44 | 04:23 to 03:39 | 13.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:09 | 04:56 to 04:47 | 2.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:05 to 03:05 | 0.0% |
| Widmer Emilie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:19 | 00:00 | 04:44 -00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 04:19 | 04:56 -00:10 | 04:44 -00:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:19 | 09:05 | 05:05 +00:14 | 09:40 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 03:38 | 14:24 | 02:31 +01:07 | 14:45 -00:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 18:02 | 05:22 +00:01 | 17:16 +00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 05:51 | 23:25 | 05:09 +00:42 | 22:38 +00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 29:16 | 05:22 +00:05 | 27:47 +01:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:56 | 34:43 | 05:17 -00:21 | 33:09 +01:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:25 | 39:39 | 05:29 -00:04 | 38:26 +01:13 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 45:04 | 05:09 -00:28 | 43:55 +01:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 49:45 | 05:24 +00:05 | 49:04 +00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 55:14 | 02:07 -00:17 | 54:28 +00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 57:04 | 05:23 +00:08 | 56:35 +00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:05 | 01:02:35 | 04:17 -01:12 | 01:01:58 +00:37 |
| Running 8 | 06:02 | 01:05:40 | 05:42 +00:20 | 01:06:15 -00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 04:23 | 01:11:42 | 04:18 +00:05 | 01:11:57 -00:15 |
| Roxzone | 06:10 | 01:22:06 | 05:51 +00:19 | 01:22:06 |
Emilie Widmer's overall performance in the 2024 Paris Hyrox race was commendable. As a top 5% athlete in her age group and top 4% overall, Emilie demonstrated significant fitness and competitiveness. Her total time of 01:22:06 reflects her dedication and preparation for this event. However, her total running time was 00:42:50, which was 5 seconds slower than the average. Emilie's best running lap was clocked at 00:05:19, suggesting that she might be more of a strength athlete as opposed to a runner. This is further supported by the fact that she started the race faster than the average but gradually slowed down in the later running segments.
Implementing the following strategies could help Emilie improve her overall race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Anelli Natalie | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:22:02 | |
| Yu Wing Ling | 2023 München | 01:22:35 | |
| Nolan Karen | 2024 Dublin | 01:21:46 | |
| Ellis Nicola | 2023 Birmingham | 01:21:39 | |
| Nicolaisen Svea | 2018 Hamburg | 01:22:31 | |
| Gańko Karolina | 2024 Gdansk | 01:22:02 | |
| Rose Kendal | 2024 London | 01:21:42 | |
| Espina Wendy | 2022 New York | 01:22:17 | |
| Ham Maddie | 2024 Sydney | 01:22:14 | |
| Chan Tanya | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Turin | 01:20:57 | |
| 2024 Milan | 01:27:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
