Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 157 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Thompson Eleanor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Thompson Eleanor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Thompson Eleanor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Thompson Eleanor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:52 | 01:01:02 to 59:10 | 34.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:13 | 04:16 to 03:03 | 22.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 08:59 to 08:12 | 14.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:37 | 08:42 to 08:05 | 11.3% |
| Rowing | 00:29 | 06:38 to 06:09 | 8.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 04:07 to 03:50 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 05:57 to 05:45 | 3.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 09:37 to 09:37 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:14 to 06:14 | 0.0% |
| Thompson Eleanor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:55 | 00:00 | 06:30 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:57 | 05:55 | 05:41 +00:16 | 06:30 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 06:59 | 11:52 | 07:09 -00:10 | 12:11 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 04:07 | 18:51 | 03:49 +00:18 | 19:20 -00:29 |
| Running 3 | 07:05 | 22:58 | 07:43 -00:38 | 23:09 -00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 08:59 | 30:03 | 08:21 +00:38 | 30:52 -00:49 |
| Running 4 | 07:27 | 39:02 | 07:46 -00:19 | 39:13 -00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:37 | 46:29 | 10:28 -00:51 | 46:59 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 08:11 | 56:06 | 08:18 -00:07 | 57:27 -01:21 |
| Rowing | 06:38 | 01:04:17 | 06:07 +00:31 | 01:05:45 -01:28 |
| Running 6 | 07:58 | 01:10:55 | 07:55 +00:03 | 01:11:52 -00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:16 | 01:18:53 | 03:02 +01:14 | 01:19:47 -00:54 |
| Running 7 | 07:46 | 01:23:09 | 08:05 -00:19 | 01:22:49 +00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:14 | 01:30:55 | 07:31 -01:17 | 01:30:54 +00:01 |
| Running 8 | 09:45 | 01:37:09 | 09:19 +00:26 | 01:38:25 -01:16 |
| Wall Balls | 08:42 | 01:46:54 | 08:25 +00:17 | 01:47:44 -00:50 |
| Roxzone | 11:09 | 02:06:35 | 10:26 +00:43 | 02:06:35 |
Eleanor Thompson, in the 30-34 age group, demonstrated an impressive performance at the 2024 Paris Hyrox race. She ranked in the top 30% of all participating athletes and in the top 29% of her age group. One of her significant strengths was her running ability. Her total running time was 01:01:02, which was 02:10 faster than the average. This suggests that Eleanor has a strong running profile. However, her pacing strategy could use some adjustments. The splits for the first four running segments indicate that she may have started too fast, as her times were consistently faster than the average. This could potentially lead to early fatigue and affect her performance in the later stages of the race.
For future races, Eleanor could consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Proske Daniela | 2019 Wien | 02:06:33 | |
| Zöller Anika | 2022 Frankfurt | 02:06:10 | |
| Kennedy Nicola | 2022 London | 02:06:29 | |
| Engel Nadine | 2023 Köln | 02:06:55 | |
| Tan Xuan Li | 2023 Barcelona | 02:06:34 | |
| Enger Sabine | 2022 Essen | 02:06:46 | |
| Ang Catherine | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:06:58 | |
| Rice Mylah | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:06:49 | |
| Morshead Kelly | 2022 London | 02:06:23 | |
| Intrieri Natalie | 2024 New York | 02:06:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 02:01:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
