Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Cape Town using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kocum Kerem's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kocum Kerem's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kocum Kerem's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kocum Kerem's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:44 | 43:26 to 37:42 | 92.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 05:28 to 05:06 | 5.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:04 | 04:11 to 04:07 | 1.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 01:49 to 01:47 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Kocum Kerem | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 04:16 +00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:55 | 04:20 | 04:19 -00:24 | 04:16 +00:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 08:15 | 04:34 +00:39 | 08:35 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 13:28 | 02:37 -00:52 | 13:09 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 15:13 | 04:56 +00:45 | 15:46 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 02:36 | 20:54 | 04:21 -01:45 | 20:42 +00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 23:30 | 04:54 +00:35 | 25:03 -01:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:11 | 28:59 | 04:34 -00:23 | 29:57 -00:58 |
| Running 5 | 05:50 | 33:10 | 05:02 +00:48 | 34:31 -01:21 |
| Rowing | 04:18 | 39:00 | 04:37 -00:19 | 39:33 -00:33 |
| Running 6 | 05:32 | 43:18 | 04:57 +00:35 | 44:10 -00:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 48:50 | 01:59 -00:10 | 49:07 -00:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 50:39 | 04:55 +00:25 | 51:06 -00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:49 | 55:59 | 04:29 -01:40 | 56:01 -00:02 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 58:48 | 05:21 +00:45 | 01:00:30 -01:42 |
| Wall Balls | 05:28 | 01:04:54 | 05:41 -00:13 | 01:05:51 -00:57 |
| Roxzone | 07:08 | 01:17:21 | 05:49 +01:19 | 01:17:21 |
Kerem Kocum delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Cape Town Hyrox race, securing the 47th overall rank and the 9th position within his age group. This places him in the top 11% overall and top 14% in his age category. Notably, Kerem showcased exceptional strength capabilities, evidenced by his top percentile rankings in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges, which were significantly faster than the average. However, his total running time was 04:09 slower than average, highlighting that running is a potential area for improvement.
Kerem's pacing throughout the race suggests he started slightly slower than average in the initial running segments, and this trend continued across the subsequent running sections. His performance suggests a stronger strength profile with room for improvement in running efficiency and transitions (Roxzone).
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lennard Alex | 2024 London | 01:17:04 | |
| Scott Darren | 2023 Malaga | 01:17:01 | |
| Bedford David | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:28 | |
| Mcdonald Wayne | 2024 Sydney | 01:17:24 | |
| Reeker Christoph | 2022 Bremen | 01:17:14 | |
| Attard Albert | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:17:34 | |
| Halsema Jannes | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:17:06 | |
| Cimaroli Vadim | 2023 Milan | 01:16:59 | |
| Hesse John | 2024 Sydney | 01:17:33 | |
| Parker Rob | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dubai | 01:16:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
