Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bedford David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bedford David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bedford David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bedford David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:28 | 06:34 to 05:06 | 29.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:25 | 05:32 to 04:07 | 28.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:17 | 05:25 to 04:08 | 25.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 04:28 to 04:11 | 5.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 01:59 to 01:47 | 4.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:08 | 04:06 to 03:58 | 2.7% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:37 to 04:30 | 2.3% |
| Run Total | 00:06 | 37:48 to 37:42 | 2.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:37 to 01:37 | 0.0% |
| Bedford David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:46 | 00:00 | 04:17 +00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 04:46 | 04:19 +00:09 | 04:17 +00:29 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 09:14 | 04:34 -00:06 | 08:36 +00:38 |
| Sled Push | 01:37 | 13:42 | 02:37 -01:00 | 13:10 +00:32 |
| Running 3 | 04:32 | 15:19 | 04:57 -00:25 | 15:47 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:06 | 19:51 | 04:22 -00:16 | 20:44 -00:53 |
| Running 4 | 04:37 | 23:57 | 04:55 -00:18 | 25:06 -01:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:32 | 28:34 | 04:34 +00:58 | 30:01 -01:27 |
| Running 5 | 04:43 | 34:06 | 05:03 -00:20 | 34:35 -00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 38:49 | 04:37 +00:00 | 39:38 -00:49 |
| Running 6 | 04:48 | 43:26 | 04:57 -00:09 | 44:15 -00:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 48:14 | 01:59 +00:00 | 49:12 -00:58 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 50:13 | 04:55 -00:11 | 51:11 -00:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 54:57 | 04:30 +00:55 | 56:06 -01:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:14 | 01:00:22 | 05:22 -00:08 | 01:00:36 -00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 06:34 | 01:05:36 | 05:41 +00:53 | 01:05:58 -00:22 |
| Roxzone | 05:26 | 01:17:28 | 05:49 -00:23 | 01:17:28 |
David Bedford delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking 253rd overall out of 1801 athletes and 11th in his age group (45-49), placing him in the top 8% of his peers. Notably, his total running time of 00:37:48 was faster than the average by 01:34, indicating a strong running ability. Given this, David exhibits a runner profile and should focus on enhancing his strength exercises to balance his performance. His pacing strategy was generally effective, with the first few running splits progressively improving after a slower start, which suggests a well-managed energy distribution throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Birsin Bent | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:17:12 | |
| Evans Phil | 2024 London | 01:17:47 | |
| Monk Jamie | 2023 London | 01:17:34 | |
| Moynagh Killian | 2024 Glasgow | 01:17:26 | |
| Froeliger Benjamin | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:17:27 | |
| Doherty Shane | 2023 Dublin | 01:17:33 | |
| Worthing Scott | 2022 Birmingham | 01:17:20 | |
| Ibbotson Jordan | 2023 Rimini | 01:17:21 | |
| Morrison Brian | 2023 Chicago | 01:17:07 | |
| Durán Rodríguez Sebastián | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:17:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:23:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
