Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chen Nickey's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chen Nickey's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chen Nickey's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chen Nickey's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:37 | 51:27 to 47:50 | 56.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:58 | 07:06 to 05:08 | 30.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 05:36 to 05:02 | 8.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 05:20 to 05:11 | 2.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:23 to 02:17 | 1.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:30 to 06:30 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Chen Nickey | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:09 | 00:00 | 05:22 -01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:20 | 04:09 | 05:14 +00:06 | 05:22 -01:13 |
| Running 2 | 06:09 | 09:29 | 05:45 +00:24 | 10:36 -01:07 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 15:38 | 02:54 -01:09 | 16:21 -00:43 |
| Running 3 | 06:24 | 17:23 | 06:05 +00:19 | 19:15 -01:52 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 23:47 | 06:10 -01:31 | 25:20 -01:33 |
| Running 4 | 06:15 | 28:26 | 06:05 +00:10 | 31:30 -03:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:30 | 34:41 | 06:46 -00:16 | 37:35 -02:54 |
| Running 5 | 06:25 | 41:11 | 06:14 +00:11 | 44:21 -03:10 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 47:36 | 05:31 -00:07 | 50:35 -02:59 |
| Running 6 | 06:24 | 53:00 | 06:08 +00:16 | 56:06 -03:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 59:24 | 02:24 -00:01 | 01:02:14 -02:50 |
| Running 7 | 06:10 | 01:01:47 | 06:06 +00:04 | 01:04:38 -02:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 01:07:57 | 05:12 +00:24 | 01:10:44 -02:47 |
| Running 8 | 09:35 | 01:13:33 | 06:39 +02:56 | 01:15:56 -02:23 |
| Wall Balls | 07:06 | 01:23:08 | 05:31 +01:35 | 01:22:35 +00:33 |
| Roxzone | 05:36 | 01:35:42 | 07:36 -02:00 | 01:35:42 |
Nickey Chen delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 18% overall and within the top 17% of her age group. Her strengths are evident in the power-based exercises, such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where she performed exceptionally well. However, her total running time was slower than average, indicating potential for improvement in endurance running. Her fastest running lap at 00:06:09 suggests she has a solid foundation but could benefit from more consistent pacing. The Roxzone time was impressively managed, showing good transition efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fradin Amelie | 2024 Marseille | 01:35:41 | |
| Rathjen Gemima | 2024 Perth | 01:36:12 | |
| Gradascevic Susan | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:35:40 | |
| Van Ooteghem Soetkin | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:35:41 | |
| Fuller Pia | 2023 London | 01:36:07 | |
| Rodgers Sara | 2024 Dublin | 01:35:23 | |
| Borg Leslie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:35:45 | |
| Mckenna Sinead | 2024 Dublin | 01:35:56 | |
| John Teresa | 2023 Melbourne | 01:35:21 | |
| Timmins Amy | 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
