Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Phu Linna's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Phu Linna's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Phu Linna's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Phu Linna's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:36 | 06:25 to 04:49 | 30.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:33 | 07:12 to 05:39 | 29.7% |
| Run Total | 01:05 | 47:39 to 46:34 | 20.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:53 | 07:02 to 06:09 | 16.9% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:29 to 05:23 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Phu Linna | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:21 | 00:00 | 05:15 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 05:21 | 05:10 -00:26 | 05:15 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:47 | 10:05 | 05:37 +00:10 | 10:25 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 15:52 | 02:51 -00:33 | 16:02 -00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:58 | 18:10 | 05:55 +00:03 | 18:53 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 07:12 | 24:08 | 06:00 +01:12 | 24:48 -00:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:55 | 31:20 | 05:58 -00:03 | 30:48 +00:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:02 | 37:15 | 06:31 +00:31 | 36:46 +00:29 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 44:17 | 06:08 -00:01 | 43:17 +01:00 |
| Rowing | 05:29 | 50:24 | 05:27 +00:02 | 49:25 +00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 55:53 | 06:02 -00:03 | 54:52 +01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 01:01:52 | 02:19 -00:13 | 01:00:54 +00:58 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 01:03:58 | 05:59 +00:02 | 01:03:13 +00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:25 | 01:09:59 | 05:01 +01:24 | 01:09:12 +00:47 |
| Running 8 | 06:34 | 01:16:24 | 06:30 +00:04 | 01:14:13 +02:11 |
| Wall Balls | 03:45 | 01:22:58 | 05:13 -01:28 | 01:20:43 +02:15 |
| Roxzone | 06:39 | 01:33:15 | 07:19 -00:40 | 01:33:15 |
Linna Phu delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, finishing in the top 20% of all athletes and the top 18% in her age group. Her overall time was an impressive 01:33:15, with a total running time that was 00:25 faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability. Linna's best running lap was recorded at 00:05:47, showcasing her potential for speed. However, a review of her first four running segments suggests that she started slightly slower than average, pointing to a conservative pacing strategy. Her profile leans towards a more balanced athlete, with strengths in both running and strength-based exercises, but with room for improvement in certain strength-based segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Barbera Angela | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:51 | |
| Oates Jess | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:02 | |
| Landon Maggie | 2020 Chicago | 01:33:40 | |
| O'Donnell Patricia | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:33:20 | |
| Cantwell Deirdre | 2024 Dublin | 01:33:21 | |
| Jasper Alex | 2024 Birmingham | 01:33:29 | |
| Ramachandran Sumithra | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:33:36 | |
| Van Olst Marian | 2022 Maastricht | 01:33:02 | |
| Czora Daria | 2023 München | 01:32:52 | |
| Portales Momina | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
