Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schilder Vince's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schilder Vince's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schilder Vince's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schilder Vince's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:43 | 44:25 to 38:42 | 94.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:19 | 04:39 to 04:20 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:26 to 03:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Schilder Vince | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:35 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 03:35 | 04:20 -00:15 | 04:20 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 07:40 | 04:40 +00:32 | 08:40 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 12:52 | 02:41 -00:56 | 13:20 -00:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 14:37 | 05:03 +00:25 | 16:01 -01:24 |
| Sled Pull | 03:26 | 20:05 | 04:28 -01:02 | 21:04 -00:59 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 23:31 | 05:02 +00:33 | 25:32 -02:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:39 | 29:06 | 04:45 -00:06 | 30:34 -01:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:58 | 33:45 | 05:11 +00:47 | 35:19 -01:34 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 39:43 | 04:40 -00:10 | 40:30 -00:47 |
| Running 6 | 05:54 | 44:13 | 05:04 +00:50 | 45:10 -00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 50:07 | 02:02 -00:16 | 50:14 -00:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 51:53 | 05:03 +00:55 | 52:16 -00:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:10 | 57:51 | 04:37 -00:27 | 57:19 +00:32 |
| Running 8 | 06:49 | 01:02:01 | 05:30 +01:19 | 01:01:56 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 04:44 | 01:08:50 | 05:50 -01:06 | 01:07:26 +01:24 |
| Roxzone | 05:50 | 01:19:14 | 05:58 -00:08 | 01:19:14 |
Vince Schilder delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 20% overall and the top 18% in his age group. His overall time was 01:19:14, displaying a strong aptitude for strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls. However, his total running time was 04:09 slower than the average, indicating room for improvement in running efficiency. His pacing suggests he started the race at a quick pace but gradually slowed down, which is evident from the declining percentile ranks in the running segments. This pattern indicates a need for better endurance management. His profile leans more towards strength, although he showcases potential as a hybrid athlete.
Implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement will greatly enhance Vince’s future performance, potentially elevating his ranking in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lewis Steffan | 2023 London | 01:18:58 | |
| Kelley Scott | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:17 | |
| Choquet Raynald | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:19:10 | |
| Lakey Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:29 | |
| Merlonetti Glauco | 2024 Milan | 01:19:14 | |
| Gonzlez Delgado Mario | 2023 Malaga | 01:19:25 | |
| Brückom Florian | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:19:44 | |
| Bahlouli Alix | 2023 Stockholm | 01:18:51 | |
| Weber Felix | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:19:17 | |
| Porte Tom | 2024 Gdansk | 01:19:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
