Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcmahon David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcmahon David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcmahon David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcmahon David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:51 | 07:04 to 05:13 | 33.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:35 | 06:35 to 05:00 | 28.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:10 | 06:39 to 05:29 | 21.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:40 to 02:11 | 8.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:23 | 06:59 to 06:36 | 7.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:30 to 04:29 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:52 to 41:52 | 0.0% |
| Mcmahon David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:09 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 04:09 | 04:31 -00:01 | 04:46 -00:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:34 | 08:39 | 05:08 -00:34 | 09:17 -00:38 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 13:13 | 03:04 -00:12 | 14:25 -01:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:07 | 16:05 | 05:37 -00:30 | 17:29 -01:24 |
| Sled Pull | 06:35 | 21:12 | 05:14 +01:21 | 23:06 -01:54 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 27:47 | 05:36 -00:16 | 28:20 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:39 | 33:07 | 05:45 +00:54 | 33:56 -00:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 39:46 | 05:47 -00:21 | 39:41 +00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 45:12 | 04:54 -00:18 | 45:28 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 49:48 | 05:37 -00:12 | 50:22 -00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:40 | 55:13 | 02:17 +00:23 | 55:59 -00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:36 | 57:53 | 05:36 +00:00 | 58:16 -00:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:04 | 01:03:29 | 05:28 +01:36 | 01:03:52 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:18 | 01:10:33 | 06:18 +00:00 | 01:09:20 +01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 06:59 | 01:16:51 | 06:57 +00:02 | 01:15:38 +01:13 |
| Roxzone | 06:18 | 01:30:01 | 07:26 -01:08 | 01:30:01 |
David Mcmahon demonstrated a well-balanced performance in the 2024 Paris Hyrox race. His overall rank was in the top 61% of athletes and his rank in his age group was in the top 64%. Notably, his total running time was 2 minutes and 45 seconds faster than average, indicating a strong performance in the running segments of the race. This suggests that David has a more runner profile, excelling in high-speed, endurance-based tasks. His pacing across the running segments was generally above average, with a particularly impressive performance in the first four running sections where he started faster than the average competitor.
Given David's strong performance in running segments, a potential race strategy could be to push harder in these sections to gain an advantage. However, this needs to be balanced with conserving energy for the strength-based tasks. Practicing transitions between running and strength tasks can also help improve overall race time. Furthermore, focusing on maintaining a steady pace throughout the race, rather than starting too quickly or slowing down towards the end, can help ensure a more consistent performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruiz Ortega Jose Luis | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:58 | |
| Domínguez Peláez Joaquín | 2024 Bilbao | 01:29:38 | |
| Van Jaarsveld Mathijs | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:29:57 | |
| Marshall James | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:21 | |
| Merino Sergi | 2023 Barcelona | 01:30:01 | |
| Ulmer Marius | 2023 München | 01:30:05 | |
| Rathje Erik | 2023 Hannover | 01:30:26 | |
| Mccarthy Padraig | 2024 Dublin | 01:30:22 | |
| Ryan Donncha | 2024 Katowice | 01:29:47 | |
| Oliver Sam | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Barcelona | 01:45:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
