Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Montgomery Pamela's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Montgomery Pamela's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Montgomery Pamela's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Montgomery Pamela's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:18 | 03:46 to 02:28 | 37.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:49 | 05:05 to 04:16 | 23.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 05:57 to 05:10 | 22.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:11 | 05:42 to 05:31 | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:15 to 02:04 | 5.3% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:22 to 05:13 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:01 to 04:58 | 1.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:45 to 42:45 | 0.0% |
| Montgomery Pamela | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:33 | 00:00 | 05:02 +00:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 05:33 | 05:04 -00:03 | 05:02 +00:31 |
| Running 2 | 04:39 | 10:34 | 05:23 -00:44 | 10:06 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 03:46 | 15:13 | 02:40 +01:06 | 15:29 -00:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 18:59 | 05:39 -00:17 | 18:09 +00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 05:57 | 24:21 | 05:35 +00:22 | 23:48 +00:33 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 30:18 | 05:42 -00:14 | 29:23 +00:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:42 | 35:46 | 05:54 -00:12 | 35:05 +00:41 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 41:28 | 05:50 -00:15 | 40:59 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 47:03 | 05:19 +00:03 | 46:49 +00:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 52:25 | 05:43 -00:19 | 52:08 +00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 57:49 | 02:12 +00:03 | 57:51 -00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 01:00:04 | 05:42 -00:22 | 01:00:03 +00:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:09 | 01:05:24 | 04:38 -00:29 | 01:05:45 -00:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:27 | 01:09:33 | 06:04 -00:37 | 01:10:23 -00:50 |
| Wall Balls | 05:05 | 01:15:00 | 04:48 +00:17 | 01:16:27 -01:27 |
| Roxzone | 07:53 | 01:27:52 | 06:37 +01:16 | 01:27:52 |
Pamela Montgomery showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Madrid HYROX race. Her overall rank of 140, placing her in the top 9% of 1509 athletes, and a remarkable 15th rank in her age group (Top 5% of 292 athletes) underlines her strength and tenacity. Pamela's total running time was 2 minutes and 51 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, a slower pace in the initial running segment, followed by progressively faster times, suggests that she may have started too slow. Her performance in strength-based exercises varied, pointing towards the need for a more balanced training approach.
Implementing the following strategies could lead to improved performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brandt Lea | 2024 Hamburg | 01:27:56 | |
| Paulley Leah | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:28:11 | |
| Byrne Abby | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:25 | |
| Lutton Jennifer | 2023 Dublin | 01:27:29 | |
| Siu Ka Wah | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:27:33 | |
| WimmenhoeveVisser Klaske | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:42 | |
| Rostami Hasti | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:26 | |
| Ray Kristen | 2024 Dallas | 01:28:19 | |
| Ullmann Claudia | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:06 | |
| Iezzi Lara | 2023 Rimini | 01:27:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
