Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Uit Den Boogaard Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Uit Den Boogaard Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Uit Den Boogaard Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Uit Den Boogaard Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:22 | 48:16 to 43:54 | 94.9% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:00 to 04:52 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:35 to 04:29 | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:42 to 02:42 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:03 to 06:03 | 0.0% |
| Uit Den Boogaard Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:05 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 04:05 | 04:31 +00:04 | 04:46 -00:41 |
| Running 2 | 05:53 | 08:40 | 05:11 +00:42 | 09:17 -00:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 14:33 | 03:04 -00:22 | 14:28 +00:05 |
| Running 3 | 06:01 | 17:15 | 05:40 +00:21 | 17:32 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:08 | 23:16 | 05:17 -01:09 | 23:12 +00:04 |
| Running 4 | 06:12 | 27:24 | 05:38 +00:34 | 28:29 -01:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:44 | 33:36 | 05:50 -01:06 | 34:07 -00:31 |
| Running 5 | 06:24 | 38:20 | 05:51 +00:33 | 39:57 -01:37 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 44:44 | 04:56 +00:04 | 45:48 -01:04 |
| Running 6 | 06:28 | 49:44 | 05:41 +00:47 | 50:44 -01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 56:12 | 02:18 -00:10 | 56:25 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 06:23 | 58:20 | 05:39 +00:44 | 58:43 -00:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:04:43 | 05:31 -00:20 | 01:04:22 +00:21 |
| Running 8 | 06:54 | 01:09:54 | 06:23 +00:31 | 01:09:53 +00:01 |
| Wall Balls | 06:03 | 01:16:48 | 07:05 -01:02 | 01:16:16 +00:32 |
| Roxzone | 08:11 | 01:30:54 | 07:33 +00:38 | 01:30:54 |
Nick Uit Den Boogaard completed his HYROX race in Amsterdam with an overall time of 01:30:54, placing him in the top 43% of all athletes and top 49% in his age group. His performance highlights a strong capability in strength-based exercises, as evidenced by faster-than-average times in segments like the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls. However, his total running time was 03:00 slower than average, suggesting that his running performance needs improvement. The pacing analysis indicates he started the race fast, especially noticeable in Running 1, but progressively slowed down, indicating potential issues with endurance or pacing strategy. This suggests Nick has a hybrid profile with a leaning towards strength but needs to work on his running endurance and pacing throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fleischmann Manuel | 2024 Köln | 01:30:31 | |
| Sichtman Ivan | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:31:17 | |
| Massam. James | 2024 Dublin | 01:30:44 | |
| Clarke Anthony | 2023 London | 01:31:00 | |
| Kwiatkowski David | 2019 Hannover | 01:30:43 | |
| Kuhlmann Michel | 2022 Essen | 01:30:34 | |
| Ly Kelly | 2024 Paris | 01:30:50 | |
| Kaste Matthias | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:30:29 | |
| Huang Yen Hsiang | 2024 Taipei | 01:30:53 | |
| Schönfeld Arthur | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:31:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:22:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
