Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 769 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Walsh Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Walsh Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Walsh Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Walsh Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:54 | 51:44 to 49:50 | 38.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:22 | 08:24 to 07:02 | 27.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:44 | 07:03 to 06:19 | 14.9% |
| Rowing | 00:29 | 06:04 to 05:35 | 9.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 05:37 to 05:22 | 5.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:36 to 02:25 | 3.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:48 to 02:48 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Walsh Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 05:28 -01:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 03:58 | 05:20 -00:17 | 05:28 -01:30 |
| Running 2 | 06:37 | 09:01 | 06:00 +00:37 | 10:48 -01:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 15:38 | 03:04 -00:16 | 16:48 -01:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:53 | 18:26 | 06:23 +00:30 | 19:52 -01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 07:03 | 25:19 | 06:31 +00:32 | 26:15 -00:56 |
| Running 4 | 07:10 | 32:22 | 06:24 +00:46 | 32:46 -00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:24 | 39:32 | 07:15 +01:09 | 39:10 +00:22 |
| Running 5 | 07:24 | 47:56 | 06:35 +00:49 | 46:25 +01:31 |
| Rowing | 06:04 | 55:20 | 05:38 +00:26 | 53:00 +02:20 |
| Running 6 | 07:11 | 01:01:24 | 06:28 +00:43 | 58:38 +02:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 01:08:35 | 02:29 +00:07 | 01:05:06 +03:29 |
| Running 7 | 07:21 | 01:11:11 | 06:27 +00:54 | 01:07:35 +03:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:37 | 01:18:32 | 05:34 +00:03 | 01:14:02 +04:30 |
| Running 8 | 05:14 | 01:24:09 | 07:08 -01:54 | 01:19:36 +04:33 |
| Wall Balls | 05:24 | 01:29:23 | 05:50 -00:26 | 01:26:44 +02:39 |
| Roxzone | 06:08 | 01:40:47 | 08:13 -02:05 | 01:40:47 |
Emma Walsh's performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX race places her in the top 22% of all athletes and the top 21% of her age group. Her overall time was 01:40:47, with a total running time of 00:51:44, which indicates that she is stronger in the strength segments than in the running segments. Her best running lap was 00:05:14. Notably, Emma started the race much faster than average but gradually lost time in the consequent segments. This suggests that she might have started too fast, leading to fatigue in the later stages of the race.
Based on her performance, Emma would benefit from a more conservative pacing strategy. By starting at a slightly slower pace, she can conserve energy for the later stages of the race. Additionally, focusing on proper form during the strength segments can help improve efficiency and prevent fatigue. Emma should also practice transitioning between running and strength segments to reduce the roxzone time. Lastly, including strength training that targets the specific muscles used in the strength segments can help improve her overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| King Isabel | 2024 New York | 01:41:12 | |
| Schmied Alexandra | 2019 Wien | 01:41:13 | |
| Kielhorn Lena | 2022 Bremen | 01:40:49 | |
| Mollenkamp Amy | 2020 Chicago | 01:40:29 | |
| Goemaere Dolores | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:40:59 | |
| Verta Loretta | 2023 Dallas | 01:40:44 | |
| Vasquez Maricruz | 2024 Houston | 01:40:36 | |
| Muelbaier Maria | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:40:28 | |
| Ng Jing Wen | 2024 Singapore | 01:40:39 | |
| Šarić Mirela | 2024 Marseille | 01:40:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
