Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Delaney Elizabeth's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Delaney Elizabeth's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Delaney Elizabeth's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Delaney Elizabeth's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 01:29 | 03:25 to 01:56 | 24.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:22 | 05:24 to 04:02 | 22.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:07 | 04:53 to 03:46 | 18.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:58 | 05:54 to 04:56 | 15.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:50 | 05:34 to 04:44 | 13.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 02:32 to 02:15 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:56 to 04:50 | 1.6% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:37 to 40:37 | 0.0% |
| Delaney Elizabeth | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:43 | 00:00 | 04:49 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 03:43 | 04:58 -00:02 | 04:49 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:39 | 05:09 -00:09 | 09:47 -01:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 13:39 | 02:32 +00:00 | 14:56 -01:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 16:11 | 05:25 -00:19 | 17:28 -01:17 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 21:17 | 05:13 +00:21 | 22:53 -01:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 26:51 | 05:26 -00:21 | 28:06 -01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:54 | 31:56 | 05:22 +00:32 | 33:32 -01:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:13 | 37:50 | 05:32 -00:19 | 38:54 -01:04 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 43:03 | 05:12 -00:16 | 44:26 -01:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:41 | 47:59 | 05:27 +00:14 | 49:38 -01:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:25 | 53:40 | 02:07 +01:18 | 55:05 -01:25 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 57:05 | 05:25 -00:08 | 57:12 -00:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:24 | 01:02:22 | 04:19 +01:05 | 01:02:37 -00:15 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:07:46 | 05:44 -00:10 | 01:06:56 +00:50 |
| Wall Balls | 04:53 | 01:13:20 | 04:22 +00:31 | 01:12:40 +00:40 |
| Roxzone | 04:58 | 01:23:05 | 06:03 -01:05 | 01:23:05 |
Elizabeth Delaney delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 155 out of 1014 athletes, placing her in the top 15%. In her age group, she ranked 40th, which positions her in the top 16% of her peers. Her overall time was 01:23:05, with a total running time of 00:40:37, which is 02:47 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, her performance in strength-based exercises suggests room for improvement, particularly in post-exercise compromised running scenarios. Additionally, her initial running segments (Running 1 to Running 4) show that she started at a commendable pace, avoiding the common pitfall of starting too fast or too slow.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lawn Helena | 2023 Birmingham | 01:22:39 | |
| Dunne Lucy | 2024 Malaga | 01:22:44 | |
| Bartels Gabrièl | 2024 Paris | 01:22:46 | |
| Wegehaupt Anke | 2022 Berlin | 01:22:40 | |
| Greif Gabriella | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:29 | |
| Hörsgen AnnKatrin | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:23:04 | |
| Grube Liza Madeleine | 2022 Hamburg | 01:23:30 | |
| Grozav Daniela | 2023 London | 01:22:45 | |
| Perlinger Alena | 2024 Köln | 01:22:53 | |
| Schoeman Jessica | 2024 Cape Town | 01:23:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
