Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 737 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wilson Rebecca's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wilson Rebecca's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wilson Rebecca's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wilson Rebecca's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:31 | 56:31 to 51:00 | 86.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:45 | 08:06 to 07:21 | 11.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 03:14 to 03:06 | 2.1% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:40 to 05:39 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Wilson Rebecca | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:57 | 00:00 | 05:37 +01:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:10 | 06:57 | 05:22 -00:12 | 05:37 +01:20 |
| Running 2 | 06:31 | 12:07 | 06:09 +00:22 | 10:59 +01:08 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 18:38 | 03:07 +00:07 | 17:08 +01:30 |
| Running 3 | 07:08 | 21:52 | 06:30 +00:38 | 20:15 +01:37 |
| Sled Pull | 05:40 | 29:00 | 06:47 -01:07 | 26:45 +02:15 |
| Running 4 | 07:20 | 34:40 | 06:33 +00:47 | 33:32 +01:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:06 | 42:00 | 07:35 +00:31 | 40:05 +01:55 |
| Running 5 | 07:17 | 50:06 | 06:44 +00:33 | 47:40 +02:26 |
| Rowing | 05:40 | 57:23 | 05:42 -00:02 | 54:24 +02:59 |
| Running 6 | 07:09 | 01:03:03 | 06:36 +00:33 | 01:00:06 +02:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 01:10:12 | 02:31 -00:26 | 01:06:42 +03:30 |
| Running 7 | 06:47 | 01:12:17 | 06:37 +00:10 | 01:09:13 +03:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:00 | 01:19:04 | 05:41 -00:41 | 01:15:50 +03:14 |
| Running 8 | 07:26 | 01:24:04 | 07:14 +00:12 | 01:21:31 +02:33 |
| Wall Balls | 05:05 | 01:31:30 | 06:09 -01:04 | 01:28:45 +02:45 |
| Roxzone | 06:54 | 01:43:18 | 08:24 -01:30 | 01:43:18 |
Rebecca's splits analysis reveals some areas of strength and areas that need improvement. Her ski erg and sled push segments were faster than average, indicating proficiency in these exercises. However, her running segments (running 1, running 2, running 3, running 4, running 5, running 6, running 7, and running 8) all showed slower times compared to the average, suggesting that her running performance can be improved.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on specific areas of improvement, Rebecca can enhance her performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fahmy Janina | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:43:07 | |
| Van Poecke Ilvy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:42:58 | |
| Somers Hannah | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:28 | |
| Pastori Ambra | 2023 Rimini | 01:43:47 | |
| Minkoff Debby | 2021 London | 01:42:55 | |
| Vantorre Charlène | 2024 Marseille | 01:43:44 | |
| Brown Emma | 2024 Paris | 01:43:08 | |
| Sharkey Mhairi | 2022 London | 01:43:07 | |
| Woolfolk Michelle | 2021 Austin | 01:43:14 | |
| Köhler Julia | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:43:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:32:14 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:38:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
