Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Patel Mitesh's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Patel Mitesh's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Patel Mitesh's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Patel Mitesh's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:04 | 10:24 to 07:20 | 38.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:18 | 06:46 to 05:28 | 16.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:13 | 06:56 to 05:43 | 15.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:38 | 06:44 to 06:06 | 7.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:33 | 05:09 to 04:36 | 6.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:28 | 03:40 to 03:12 | 5.8% |
| Rowing | 00:26 | 05:26 to 05:00 | 5.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:43 to 02:23 | 4.2% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:45 to 40:45 | 0.0% |
| Patel Mitesh | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 04:59 +00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 05:29 | 04:37 +00:32 | 04:59 +00:30 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 10:38 | 05:25 -00:50 | 09:36 +01:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:40 | 15:13 | 03:15 +00:25 | 15:01 +00:12 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 18:53 | 05:59 -01:01 | 18:16 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 06:46 | 23:51 | 05:40 +01:06 | 24:15 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 04:58 | 30:37 | 05:55 -00:57 | 29:55 +00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:44 | 35:35 | 06:22 +00:22 | 35:50 -00:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 42:19 | 06:10 -00:59 | 42:12 +00:07 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 47:30 | 05:03 +00:23 | 48:22 -00:52 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 52:56 | 05:58 -00:59 | 53:25 -00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:43 | 57:55 | 02:25 +00:18 | 59:23 -01:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:02 | 01:00:38 | 05:57 -00:55 | 01:01:48 -01:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:56 | 01:05:40 | 05:55 +01:01 | 01:07:45 -02:05 |
| Running 8 | 05:37 | 01:12:36 | 06:53 -01:16 | 01:13:40 -01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 10:24 | 01:18:13 | 07:43 +02:41 | 01:20:33 -02:20 |
| Roxzone | 08:07 | 01:36:36 | 08:20 -00:13 | 01:36:36 |
Firstly, Mitesh Patel demonstrated a commendable performance in the HYROX race, achieving a rank in the top 50% of all athletes. An impressive feat considering the competitive nature of the event. His performance in the running segments was particularly noteworthy. Finishing the total running time 06:45 faster than average reflects his strong running capabilities. He consistently ranked in the top 5 percentile in the running segments from Running 2 to Running 8. However, he started slower in Running 1, which suggests that he might have paced himself conservatively at the start.
Overall, Mitesh fits the profile of a strong runner. The data suggests that he may need to focus more on strength training to balance out his performance, as the slower times in strength-related segments like the Wall Balls, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges indicate a relative weakness in this area.
To optimize his race performance, Mitesh might consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Haver Niklas | 2022 Essen | 01:36:10 | |
| Schooling William | 2024 Stockholm | 01:36:45 | |
| Van Het Kaar Jorn | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:28 | |
| Penny Kenton | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:36:15 | |
| Belshaw Harry | 2024 Milan | 01:36:52 | |
| Burton Gary | 2023 Sydney | 01:36:35 | |
| Hamilton Mark | 2023 London | 01:36:31 | |
| Hocke Alexander | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:36:59 | |
| Greaves Josh | 2024 Birmingham | 01:37:02 | |
| Knobel Philippe | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:27:31 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 02:03:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
