Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chiffey Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chiffey Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chiffey Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chiffey Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:31 | 52:04 to 48:33 | 80.5% |
| Rowing | 00:29 | 05:37 to 05:08 | 11.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 06:13 to 05:53 | 7.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 06:11 to 06:09 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:25 to 06:25 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:55 to 07:55 | 0.0% |
| Chiffey Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:51 | 00:00 | 05:10 +00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 05:51 | 04:41 +00:00 | 05:10 +00:41 |
| Running 2 | 05:50 | 10:32 | 05:40 +00:10 | 09:51 +00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 16:22 | 03:30 -00:59 | 15:31 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 05:56 | 18:53 | 06:16 -00:20 | 19:01 -00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 06:13 | 24:49 | 06:03 +00:10 | 25:17 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 06:17 | 31:02 | 06:14 +00:03 | 31:20 -00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:25 | 37:19 | 06:47 -00:22 | 37:34 -00:15 |
| Running 5 | 07:05 | 43:44 | 06:31 +00:34 | 44:21 -00:37 |
| Rowing | 05:37 | 50:49 | 05:11 +00:26 | 50:52 -00:03 |
| Running 6 | 06:59 | 56:26 | 06:20 +00:39 | 56:03 +00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 01:03:25 | 02:36 -00:06 | 01:02:23 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 06:48 | 01:05:55 | 06:19 +00:29 | 01:04:59 +00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:11 | 01:12:43 | 06:19 -00:08 | 01:11:18 +01:25 |
| Running 8 | 07:22 | 01:18:54 | 07:25 -00:03 | 01:17:37 +01:17 |
| Wall Balls | 07:55 | 01:26:16 | 08:16 -00:21 | 01:25:02 +01:14 |
| Roxzone | 08:09 | 01:42:12 | 08:54 -00:45 | 01:42:12 |
Mark Chiffey's performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event demonstrates a commendable effort, placing him in the top 52% overall and the top 54% in his age group. Mark's overall time of 01:42:12 showcases his determination, although there are notable areas where improvement can be achieved. His total running time was 01:53 slower than average, indicating a need for enhanced running speed and endurance. Mark's strengths lie in his ability to tackle strength-based exercises efficiently, as evidenced by his top percentile ranks in segments like the Sled Push and Sandbag Lunges. However, his pacing strategy appears to have been slightly conservative in the initial runs, which could suggest room for more aggressive starts. Overall, Mark has a hybrid profile with a slight inclination towards strength, and with targeted training, he can significantly improve his running performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortune Zubair | 2024 Cape Town | 01:42:08 | |
| Gerlach Alexander | 2018 Leipzig | 01:41:54 | |
| Ferguson Jordan | 2024 Stockholm | 01:42:42 | |
| Chu Ka Chun | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:41:45 | |
| To Kwok Caleb Wong | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:42:39 | |
| King Ollie | 2023 Glasgow | 01:42:01 | |
| Assi Indi | 2024 Birmingham | 01:42:20 | |
| Kottenhoff Henning | 2024 Hamburg | 01:42:12 | |
| Nagel Richard | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:42:03 | |
| Conte Paul | 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
