Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Verhaar Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Verhaar Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Verhaar Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Verhaar Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:46 | 06:47 to 05:01 | 36.8% |
| Run Total | 01:32 | 44:12 to 42:40 | 31.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:39 | 03:28 to 02:49 | 13.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 | 06:48 to 06:19 | 10.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:16 to 02:07 | 3.1% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:55 to 04:47 | 2.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:31 to 04:26 | 1.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Verhaar Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:00 | 00:00 | 04:41 -00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 04:00 | 04:29 +00:02 | 04:41 -00:41 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 08:31 | 05:05 +00:16 | 09:10 -00:39 |
| Sled Push | 03:28 | 13:52 | 02:59 +00:29 | 14:15 -00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 17:20 | 05:32 -00:10 | 17:14 +00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 22:42 | 05:05 -00:47 | 22:46 -00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 27:00 | 05:30 +00:01 | 27:51 -00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:12 | 32:31 | 05:34 -00:22 | 33:21 -00:50 |
| Running 5 | 05:46 | 37:43 | 05:42 +00:04 | 38:55 -01:12 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 43:29 | 04:52 +00:03 | 44:37 -01:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:51 | 48:24 | 05:33 +00:18 | 49:29 -01:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 54:15 | 02:13 +00:03 | 55:02 -00:47 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 56:31 | 05:32 +00:16 | 57:15 -00:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:47 | 01:02:19 | 05:18 +01:29 | 01:02:47 -00:28 |
| Running 8 | 06:37 | 01:09:06 | 06:10 +00:27 | 01:08:05 +01:01 |
| Wall Balls | 06:48 | 01:15:43 | 06:45 +00:03 | 01:14:15 +01:28 |
| Roxzone | 05:41 | 01:28:04 | 07:04 -01:23 | 01:28:04 |
Paul Verhaar, competing in the HYROX event in the 45-49 age group, demonstrated a commendable performance, securing an overall rank of 1218, placing him in the top 39% of all athletes. Within his age category, he ranked 69th, putting him in the top 29%. His overall completion time was 01:28:04.
An analysis of his performance indicates that Paul exhibits a hybrid profile, with a slight edge in strength-based events but with room for improvement in running endurance. His total running time was 00:44:12, which is 00:06 slower than the average, suggesting a need to enhance his running performance. Early in his race, he started strong, especially in Running 1, where he was significantly faster than the average, indicating perhaps a slightly too fast start that might have contributed to slower segments later.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Jamie | 2022 London | 01:28:32 | |
| Burns Chris | 2022 Birmingham | 01:28:23 | |
| Hood Jordan | 2022 London | 01:28:17 | |
| Lock Ian | 2023 Birmingham | 01:28:05 | |
| Breitling Tillmann | 2021 Berlin | 01:28:23 | |
| Telles Daniel | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:28:34 | |
| Theeuwes Jaap | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:27:58 | |
| Gullis Thomas | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:36 | |
| Probadnick Mathias | 2023 Hamburg | 01:27:45 | |
| Fortes Rudy | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:28:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:47:32 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:46:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
