Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Roes Jelger's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Roes Jelger's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Roes Jelger's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Roes Jelger's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:16 | 50:31 to 45:15 | 94.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 03:16 to 03:05 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:41 to 04:33 | 2.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Roes Jelger | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:03 | 00:00 | 04:53 -00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 04:03 | 04:34 +00:07 | 04:53 -00:50 |
| Running 2 | 06:06 | 08:44 | 05:20 +00:46 | 09:27 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 03:16 | 14:50 | 03:11 +00:05 | 14:47 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 06:16 | 18:06 | 05:50 +00:26 | 17:58 +00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 24:22 | 05:29 -00:31 | 23:48 +00:34 |
| Running 4 | 06:31 | 29:20 | 05:49 +00:42 | 29:17 +00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:02 | 35:51 | 06:08 -01:06 | 35:06 +00:45 |
| Running 5 | 06:32 | 40:53 | 06:02 +00:30 | 41:14 -00:21 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 47:25 | 04:59 -00:07 | 47:16 +00:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:34 | 52:17 | 05:52 +00:42 | 52:15 +00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 58:51 | 02:23 -00:06 | 58:07 +00:44 |
| Running 7 | 06:52 | 01:01:08 | 05:51 +01:01 | 01:00:30 +00:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:08 | 01:08:00 | 05:42 -00:34 | 01:06:21 +01:39 |
| Running 8 | 07:40 | 01:13:08 | 06:39 +01:01 | 01:12:03 +01:05 |
| Wall Balls | 05:29 | 01:20:48 | 07:25 -01:56 | 01:18:42 +02:06 |
| Roxzone | 07:49 | 01:33:59 | 07:52 -00:03 | 01:33:59 |
Jelger Roes completed the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race with an overall time of 01:33:59, placing him in the top 49% of all participants and the top 54% in his age group. His performance indicates a hybrid profile, showing strengths in both running and strength segments, but with room for improvement in running efficiency. His total running time was 3:48 slower than the average, suggesting that enhanced running training could significantly improve his overall performance. Jelger tended to start strong in the first running segment but gradually slowed, indicating a need for better pacing strategy.
Jelger's running segments were consistently slower than average after the initial burst in Running 1. Focusing on improving endurance and speed in the middle and later segments can help. Consider incorporating the following:
The Sled Push segment was on par with the average time. Improving this area can lead to a competitive edge.
Jelger's Roxzone time indicates a need for quicker transitions. Efficient transitions can save critical seconds.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Colling Tom | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:18 | |
| Liang Jun | 2024 Dallas | 01:33:59 | |
| Mcavinney Sean | 2024 Dublin | 01:34:05 | |
| Brumfit Ben | 2023 London | 01:33:32 | |
| Joyce Robert | 2022 Birmingham | 01:34:02 | |
| wu lawrence | 2023 New York | 01:33:30 | |
| O Connor Anthony | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:33:29 | |
| Schuster Stephano | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:34:27 | |
| Ives Andrew | 2023 Melbourne | 01:33:55 | |
| Kahden Rico | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:34:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
