Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 716 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kevill Rhiannon's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kevill Rhiannon's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kevill Rhiannon's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kevill Rhiannon's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:11 | 58:11 to 51:00 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:13 to 06:13 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:52 to 06:52 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Kevill Rhiannon | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:39 | 00:00 | 05:40 -00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 05:39 | 05:22 -00:34 | 05:40 -00:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:58 | 10:27 | 06:09 -00:11 | 11:02 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:05 | 16:25 | 03:06 -01:01 | 17:11 -00:46 |
| Running 3 | 06:27 | 18:30 | 06:31 -00:04 | 20:17 -01:47 |
| Sled Pull | 06:13 | 24:57 | 06:43 -00:30 | 26:48 -01:51 |
| Running 4 | 06:45 | 31:10 | 06:34 +00:11 | 33:31 -02:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:52 | 37:55 | 07:38 -00:46 | 40:05 -02:10 |
| Running 5 | 07:23 | 44:47 | 06:45 +00:38 | 47:43 -02:56 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 52:10 | 05:42 -00:39 | 54:28 -02:18 |
| Running 6 | 07:39 | 57:13 | 06:37 +01:02 | 01:00:10 -02:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:04:52 | 02:31 -00:27 | 01:06:47 -01:55 |
| Running 7 | 07:35 | 01:06:56 | 06:38 +00:57 | 01:09:18 -02:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:47 | 01:14:31 | 05:43 -00:56 | 01:15:56 -01:25 |
| Running 8 | 10:48 | 01:19:18 | 07:22 +03:26 | 01:21:39 -02:21 |
| Wall Balls | 03:35 | 01:30:06 | 06:09 -02:34 | 01:29:01 +01:05 |
| Roxzone | 10:00 | 01:43:34 | 08:24 +01:36 | 01:43:34 |
Rhiannon Kevill delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking in the top 29% overall and top 25% in her age group. She showcased exceptional strength in stationary exercises, excelling notably in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Rowing, and Wall Balls, all of which were significantly faster than the average. However, her total running time was slower than average by 5:01, indicating that running is an area where she might need additional focus. Her performance profile suggests a stronger inclination toward strength-based exercises, with a need to balance this with improved running efficiency. The initial running segments indicate that Rhiannon started at a moderate pace, neither too fast nor too slow, maintaining a consistent performance throughout.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chabrol Morgane | 2024 Paris | 01:43:57 | |
| Bateman Cheyenne | 2024 Dublin | 01:43:26 | |
| Clapperton Cassie | 2023 Glasgow | 01:43:45 | |
| Somers Hannah | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:28 | |
| Zepeda Brenda | 2024 Mexico City | 01:43:23 | |
| Balloi Cristina | 2024 Milan | 01:43:54 | |
| Mannering Victoria | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:34 | |
| Boland Karla | 2024 Dublin | 01:43:17 | |
| Kevill Rhiannon | 2024 Melbourne | 01:43:34 | |
| Harrison Allison | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:39:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
