Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Boogaard Tessa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Boogaard Tessa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Boogaard Tessa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Boogaard Tessa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:01 | 48:49 to 44:48 | 68.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:30 | 07:12 to 05:42 | 25.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:27 to 02:06 | 6.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:30 to 03:30 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:10 to 03:10 | 0.0% |
| Boogaard Tessa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 05:10 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 05:29 | 05:06 -00:29 | 05:10 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 10:06 | 05:26 +00:05 | 10:16 -00:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 15:37 | 02:45 -00:42 | 15:42 -00:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 17:40 | 05:45 -00:04 | 18:27 -00:47 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 23:21 | 05:42 -00:33 | 24:12 -00:51 |
| Running 4 | 05:57 | 28:30 | 05:46 +00:11 | 29:54 -01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:12 | 34:27 | 05:59 +01:13 | 35:40 -01:13 |
| Running 5 | 06:10 | 41:39 | 05:54 +00:16 | 41:39 +00:00 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 47:49 | 05:22 -00:41 | 47:33 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 06:23 | 52:30 | 05:48 +00:35 | 52:55 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 58:53 | 02:16 +00:11 | 58:43 +00:10 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 01:01:20 | 05:46 +00:40 | 01:00:59 +00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:30 | 01:07:46 | 04:42 -01:12 | 01:06:45 +01:01 |
| Running 8 | 07:15 | 01:11:16 | 06:10 +01:05 | 01:11:27 -00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 03:10 | 01:18:31 | 04:51 -01:41 | 01:17:37 +00:54 |
| Roxzone | 07:43 | 01:29:17 | 06:49 +00:54 | 01:29:17 |
Tessa's best running lap was 00:05:29, indicating that she has good speed and endurance. However, there were areas where she lost time compared to the average, such as in the Burpees Broad Jump, Roxzone, Running 8, and Running 7 segments.
In conclusion, Tessa Boogaard performed well overall in the 2021 Amsterdam Hyrox race. To further improve her performance, she should focus on specific areas of improvement, such as the Burpees Broad Jump, Roxzone, and running segments. By incorporating targeted training strategies, exercises, and drills, she can enhance her speed, endurance, and efficiency in these areas. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, mental preparation, and strength and conditioning training will also contribute to her overall performance improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Longley Bethan | 2022 London | 01:29:35 | |
| SpencerRogers Micaela | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:28:55 | |
| Oxley Kristen | 2023 Houston | 01:29:09 | |
| Robb Eve | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:59 | |
| Swain Victoria | 2022 Birmingham | 01:29:17 | |
| Becker Sarah | 2019 Hamburg | 01:29:09 | |
| Gmyrek Robyn | 2023 New York | 01:29:35 | |
| De Die Annemiek | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:29:10 | |
| Laughton Freya | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:10 | |
| Munton Lara | 2024 Milan | 01:28:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
