Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Laughton Freya's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Laughton Freya's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Laughton Freya's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Laughton Freya's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:32 | 47:20 to 44:48 | 54.9% |
| Wall Balls | 01:18 | 05:43 to 04:25 | 28.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:47 | 06:29 to 05:42 | 17.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Laughton Freya | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:19 | 00:00 | 05:09 +01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 06:19 | 05:06 -00:13 | 05:09 +01:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 11:12 | 05:25 -00:16 | 10:15 +00:57 |
| Sled Push | 02:12 | 16:21 | 02:45 -00:33 | 15:40 +00:41 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 18:33 | 05:45 -00:13 | 18:25 +00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 24:05 | 05:43 -00:45 | 24:10 -00:05 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 29:03 | 05:45 +00:07 | 29:53 -00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:29 | 34:55 | 05:58 +00:31 | 35:38 -00:43 |
| Running 5 | 06:13 | 41:24 | 05:53 +00:20 | 41:36 -00:12 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 47:37 | 05:21 -00:07 | 47:29 +00:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:58 | 52:51 | 05:47 +00:11 | 52:50 +00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 58:49 | 02:16 -00:15 | 58:37 +00:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 01:00:50 | 05:45 -00:03 | 01:00:53 -00:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:35 | 01:06:32 | 04:42 -01:07 | 01:06:38 -00:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:38 | 01:10:07 | 06:08 +00:30 | 01:11:20 -01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 05:43 | 01:16:45 | 04:53 +00:50 | 01:17:28 -00:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:49 | 01:29:10 | 06:49 +00:00 | 01:29:10 |
Freya Laughton has put up an impressive performance, finishing in the top 12% overall and in the top 19% in her age group. Her overall time is 01:29:10, which indicates a balanced performance in both strength and running components of the Hyrox race. However, her total running time is 01:16 slower than average, suggesting that she might benefit from a focus on improving her running speed.
Freya's performance in the first four running segments indicates that she started the race slower than the average. This could suggest a more cautious approach, but it might have also resulted in a need for her to catch up in the later stages of the race. With her best running lap being 00:05:09, it is evident that she has the potential to start the race at a faster pace.
Based on the analysis, the segments where Freya could significantly improve compared to the 25th percentile are:
Freya should consider the following strategies for her upcoming races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Holmes Laura | 2022 London | 01:29:20 | |
| Georgiou Janna | 2024 New York | 01:29:18 | |
| Lange Dagmar | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:29:05 | |
| Woods Tsiah | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:58 | |
| Ripley Elleshia | 2024 Sydney | 01:28:42 | |
| Flynn Amy | 2023 London | 01:28:58 | |
| Ng Sandy | 2024 Singapore | 01:29:28 | |
| Veness Mhairi | 2024 Brisbane | 01:28:57 | |
| Wych Alcira | 2022 London | 01:29:14 | |
| Puentez Raena | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:29:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
