Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Rowing | 03:03 (From 08:03 to 05:00) | 49.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:43 (From 07:59 to 07:16) | 11.7% |
| BBJ | 00:40 (From 06:44 to 06:04) | 10.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 (From 03:44 to 03:11) | 9.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 (From 02:50 to 02:21) | 7.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 (From 06:07 to 05:40) | 7.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 (From 04:48 to 04:36) | 3.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 05:02 to 05:02) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 43:55 to 43:55) | 0.0% |
| Nink Dennis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:34 | 00:00 | 04:59 -01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 03:34 | 04:36 +00:12 | 04:59 -01:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 08:22 | 05:23 +00:20 | 09:35 -01:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:44 | 14:05 | 03:13 +00:31 | 14:58 -00:53 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 17:49 | 05:52 -00:25 | 18:11 -00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 23:16 | 05:36 -00:34 | 24:03 -00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 28:18 | 05:53 -00:29 | 29:39 -01:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:44 | 33:42 | 06:19 +00:25 | 35:32 -01:50 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 40:26 | 06:08 -00:27 | 41:51 -01:25 |
| Rowing | 08:03 | 46:07 | 05:03 +03:00 | 47:59 -01:52 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 54:10 | 05:55 +00:12 | 53:02 +01:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:50 | 01:00:17 | 02:26 +00:24 | 58:57 +01:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:59 | 01:03:07 | 05:54 +00:05 | 01:01:23 +01:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:07 | 01:09:06 | 05:54 +00:13 | 01:07:17 +01:49 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:15:13 | 06:48 -00:45 | 01:13:11 +02:02 |
| Wall Balls | 07:59 | 01:21:16 | 07:39 +00:20 | 01:19:59 +01:17 |
| Roxzone | 06:42 | 01:35:50 | 08:12 -01:30 | 01:35:50 |
The race performance of Dennis Nink in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event is commendable. As an athlete in the 60-64 age group, Nink ranked 6th out of 15 athletes, placing him in the top 40% of his age group. His overall rank was 548 out of 1404 athletes, putting him in the top 39%. Nink's total running time of 00:43:55 was 03:10 faster than the average, showcasing his strength in running. His best running lap was 00:05:24.
Analysing the pacing, it is evident that Nink started off much faster than average in the initial stages of the race, as evidenced by his first running segment time. However, it seems Nink may have struggled with maintaining the high initial pace, as some of the later running segments were slower than average. This suggests a need for improvement in pacing strategy and consistency.
Looking at his performance profile, Nink appears to have a stronger running profile compared to strength-based exercises. This is evident from his overall faster total running time. However, the slower times in the strength-based exercises compared to the average suggest a need for more focused strength training.
Nink should consider implementing a more consistent pacing strategy during the race. Starting off too fast can lead to early fatigue, affecting performance in the later stages of the race. Maintaining a steady pace throughout the race, particularly during the running segments, may lead to overall better performance.
Given his stronger running profile, Nink should also consider leveraging this strength during the race. This might mean pushing harder during the running segments to make up for any potential time lost during the strength-based exercises. However, this should be balanced with ensuring sufficient energy reserves for the strength-based segments.
Lastly, focusing on efficient transitions can also help improve overall race time. This could include strategies such as planning the approach to each exercise zone to minimize time wasted on entry and exit, and practicing quick recovery techniques between segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Retschlag Kay | 2022 Leipzig | 01:36:18 | |
| King Russ | 2023 Anaheim | 01:35:36 | |
| Kohler Stefan | 2023 Hamburg | 01:36:06 | |
| Hodgkins Alex | 2023 Barcelona | 01:35:46 | |
| Nixon Peter | 2024 Dublin | 01:36:15 | |
| Scholte Patrick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:28 | |
| Wuketich Simon | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:35:49 | |
| Lück David | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:36:11 | |
| Carr Ben | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:35:23 | |
| Goodman Sam | 2023 Manchester | 01:35:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2020 Chicago Nink Dennis | 01:30:39 | |
| 2022 Chicago Nink Dennis | 01:34:03 | |
| 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship Nink Dennis | 01:26:03 | |
| 2022 Chicago Nink Dennis | 01:34:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Nink Dennis
