Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore National Stadium using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 254 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dennehy Timothy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dennehy Timothy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dennehy Timothy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dennehy Timothy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 06:34 | 16:53 to 10:19 | 64.3% |
| Run Total | 03:14 | 59:37 to 56:23 | 31.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:15 | 07:34 to 07:19 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 05:08 to 05:01 | 1.1% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:37 to 05:34 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:18 to 03:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:03 to 08:03 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| Dennehy Timothy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:57 | 00:00 | 05:49 +00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:08 | 05:57 | 04:56 +00:12 | 05:49 +00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 11:05 | 06:39 -01:26 | 10:45 +00:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:18 | 16:18 | 04:14 -00:56 | 17:24 -01:06 |
| Running 3 | 08:02 | 19:36 | 07:32 +00:30 | 21:38 -02:02 |
| Sled Pull | 07:34 | 27:38 | 07:14 +00:20 | 29:10 -01:32 |
| Running 4 | 08:22 | 35:12 | 07:33 +00:49 | 36:24 -01:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:03 | 43:34 | 08:50 -00:47 | 43:57 -00:23 |
| Running 5 | 08:34 | 51:37 | 08:02 +00:32 | 52:47 -01:10 |
| Rowing | 05:37 | 01:00:11 | 05:37 +00:00 | 01:00:49 -00:38 |
| Running 6 | 08:07 | 01:05:48 | 07:40 +00:27 | 01:06:26 -00:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 01:13:55 | 03:00 -01:04 | 01:14:06 -00:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 01:15:51 | 07:41 -02:19 | 01:17:06 -01:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:41 | 01:21:13 | 08:08 -04:27 | 01:24:47 -03:34 |
| Running 8 | 10:03 | 01:24:54 | 09:58 +00:05 | 01:32:55 -08:01 |
| Wall Balls | 16:53 | 01:34:57 | 10:41 +06:12 | 01:42:53 -07:56 |
| Roxzone | 13:12 | 02:04:55 | 11:21 +01:51 | 02:04:55 |
Timothy Dennehy demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Singapore National Stadium Hyrox event. With an overall rank of 824 out of 1325 athletes, Timothy placed in the top 62%. In his age group (35-39), he ranked 190 out of 296, placing him in the top 64%. His total running time of 59:37 was 1:54 faster than the average, indicating a strong running ability. However, his performance in strength-based exercises was mixed, suggesting a need for balanced training between running and strength.
Upon analyzing his running segments, there was an evident fluctuation in pacing. He started relatively slower but demonstrated a significant increase in speed during Running 2 and Running 7, indicating a potentially inconsistent pacing strategy. This suggests that Timothy may benefit from a more consistent pacing plan to maintain energy throughout the race.
By addressing these key areas, Timothy can optimize his performance, improve his rankings, and achieve a more balanced approach to the Hyrox race demands.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Gareth | 2022 Birmingham | 02:05:12 | |
| Medina Zeus | 2023 Chicago | 02:04:37 | |
| Hooijer Lucas | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:04:46 | |
| Summers Garry | 2024 London | 02:04:54 | |
| Garner Scott | 2024 Manchester | 02:04:45 | |
| Hendricks Ra'Eez | 2024 Cape Town | 02:05:22 | |
| Semeraro Paolo | 2024 Rimini | 02:04:57 | |
| Di Luccio Patrick | 2019 New York | 02:05:04 | |
| Tan Wei Wen | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:04:50 | |
| Jerry Grewal | 2021 Chicago | 02:04:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
