Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rupp Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rupp Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rupp Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rupp Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:10 | 06:25 to 05:15 | 40.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:46 | 06:18 to 05:32 | 26.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:35 | 07:14 to 06:39 | 20.2% |
| Run Total | 00:10 | 44:04 to 43:54 | 5.8% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:00 to 04:52 | 4.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 03:00 to 02:57 | 1.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:01 | 05:03 to 05:02 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Rupp Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:13 | 00:00 | 04:45 -01:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 03:13 | 04:31 -00:26 | 04:45 -01:32 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 07:18 | 05:11 +00:06 | 09:16 -01:58 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 12:35 | 03:05 -00:05 | 14:27 -01:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 15:35 | 05:40 -00:01 | 17:32 -01:57 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 21:14 | 05:17 -00:14 | 23:12 -01:58 |
| Running 4 | 05:48 | 26:17 | 05:38 +00:10 | 28:29 -02:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:18 | 32:05 | 05:49 +00:29 | 34:07 -02:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:58 | 38:23 | 05:51 +00:07 | 39:56 -01:33 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 44:21 | 04:56 +00:04 | 45:47 -01:26 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 49:21 | 05:41 +00:03 | 50:43 -01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 55:05 | 02:18 -00:08 | 56:24 -01:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:53 | 57:15 | 05:39 +00:14 | 58:42 -01:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:25 | 01:03:08 | 05:30 +00:55 | 01:04:21 -01:13 |
| Running 8 | 06:37 | 01:09:33 | 06:23 +00:14 | 01:09:51 -00:18 |
| Wall Balls | 07:14 | 01:16:10 | 07:05 +00:09 | 01:16:14 -00:04 |
| Roxzone | 07:38 | 01:30:51 | 07:32 +00:06 | 01:30:51 |
Thomas Rupp showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Karlsruhe Hyrox race, finishing in the top 41% overall and top 46% within his age group. His total running time was notably 01:14 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, Thomas's performance in strength-focused segments and the Roxzone suggests room for improvement in overall fitness and transition efficiency. His initial sprint in Running 1 was exceptionally fast, setting a pace that may have contributed to slower times in subsequent strength exercises. The athlete demonstrates a hybrid profile but leans more towards running, suggesting a need for a more balanced approach to strength training.
By addressing these areas of improvement with targeted training and strategic race planning, Thomas Rupp has the potential to significantly enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hancox Andrew | 2024 Malaga | 01:30:43 | |
| Davison Brian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:30:49 | |
| Sharkey Adam | 2023 Manchester | 01:31:21 | |
| Bugeja Matt | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:23 | |
| Wilde John | 2022 London | 01:31:06 | |
| Peters Paul | 2023 Dallas | 01:31:13 | |
| Hermeneit Reinhard | 2021 Hamburg | 01:30:39 | |
| Kuhlmann Michel | 2022 Essen | 01:30:34 | |
| George Brent | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:30:49 | |
| Van Den Boom Sjoerd | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:30:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
