Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ball Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ball Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ball Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ball Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:56 | 07:31 to 05:35 | 34.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:30 | 06:47 to 05:17 | 26.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:50 | 03:48 to 02:58 | 14.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 07:29 to 06:42 | 13.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 05:29 to 05:04 | 7.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:22 to 02:13 | 2.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:48 to 43:48 | 0.0% |
| Ball Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:23 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 03:23 | 04:32 -00:21 | 04:47 -01:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 07:34 | 05:13 -00:11 | 09:19 -01:45 |
| Sled Push | 03:48 | 12:36 | 03:06 +00:42 | 14:32 -01:56 |
| Running 3 | 05:40 | 16:24 | 05:43 -00:03 | 17:38 -01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:29 | 22:04 | 05:18 +00:11 | 23:21 -01:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:48 | 27:33 | 05:41 +00:07 | 28:39 -01:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:31 | 33:21 | 05:53 +01:38 | 34:20 -00:59 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 40:52 | 05:53 +00:04 | 40:13 +00:39 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 46:49 | 04:56 -00:16 | 46:06 +00:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:42 | 51:29 | 05:43 -00:01 | 51:02 +00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 57:11 | 02:19 +00:03 | 56:45 +00:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:47 | 59:33 | 05:41 +00:06 | 59:04 +00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:47 | 01:05:20 | 05:32 +01:15 | 01:04:45 +00:35 |
| Running 8 | 06:32 | 01:12:07 | 06:26 +00:06 | 01:10:17 +01:50 |
| Wall Balls | 07:29 | 01:18:39 | 07:08 +00:21 | 01:16:43 +01:56 |
| Roxzone | 05:25 | 01:31:26 | 07:35 -02:10 | 01:31:26 |
Jack Ball performed well in the Manchester 2024 HYROX event, ranking in the top 114% overall and 129% in his age group. He demonstrated significant strengths in running and transitions, reflected in his total running time being 01:35 faster than average and his Roxzone time being 02:04 faster than average. This indicates he has a strong runner profile and excellent transition skills. However, he also showed areas of potential improvement, particularly in strength-focused segments. His pacing varied throughout the race, with faster starts in earlier running segments but slower finishes in later segments, suggesting possible fatigue or endurance issues.
Based on Jack's performance, some strategies to implement for better performance include:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Giancristofaro Paolo | 2024 Milan | 01:30:56 | |
| Nguyen David | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:31:05 | |
| Nieland Alexander | 2024 Köln | 01:31:48 | |
| Kinder Josh | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:40 | |
| Clark Iain | 2023 Melbourne | 01:31:16 | |
| Mckenna James | 2022 New York | 01:31:43 | |
| Bartsch Denis | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:30:56 | |
| Lin Shiyi | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:31:33 | |
| Cramm Franziskus | 2024 Poznan | 01:31:27 | |
| Summersgill Daniel | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:40:41 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
