Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 470 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nijhuis Ren's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nijhuis Ren's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nijhuis Ren's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nijhuis Ren's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:46 | 01:01:21 to 53:35 | 89.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:32 | 05:27 to 04:55 | 6.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:21 | 09:51 to 09:30 | 4.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:57 to 02:57 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:27 to 06:27 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:37 to 07:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:11 to 06:11 | 0.0% |
| Nijhuis Ren | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:44 | 00:00 | 05:36 +01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:27 | 06:44 | 04:53 +00:34 | 05:36 +01:08 |
| Running 2 | 06:29 | 12:11 | 06:17 +00:12 | 10:29 +01:42 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 18:40 | 03:55 -00:58 | 16:46 +01:54 |
| Running 3 | 07:43 | 21:37 | 07:01 +00:42 | 20:41 +00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 06:27 | 29:20 | 06:51 -00:24 | 27:42 +01:38 |
| Running 4 | 07:48 | 35:47 | 07:04 +00:44 | 34:33 +01:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:37 | 43:35 | 08:09 -00:32 | 41:37 +01:58 |
| Running 5 | 08:04 | 51:12 | 07:24 +00:40 | 49:46 +01:26 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 59:16 | 05:29 -00:14 | 57:10 +02:06 |
| Running 6 | 07:54 | 01:04:31 | 07:05 +00:49 | 01:02:39 +01:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 01:12:25 | 02:52 -00:21 | 01:09:44 +02:41 |
| Running 7 | 07:52 | 01:14:56 | 07:07 +00:45 | 01:12:36 +02:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:11 | 01:22:48 | 07:27 -01:16 | 01:19:43 +03:05 |
| Running 8 | 08:49 | 01:28:59 | 09:01 -00:12 | 01:27:10 +01:49 |
| Wall Balls | 09:51 | 01:37:48 | 09:52 -00:01 | 01:36:11 +01:37 |
| Roxzone | 09:12 | 01:56:44 | 10:41 -01:29 | 01:56:44 |
Ren Nijhuis' best running lap was 00:06:29, indicating his potential in running. However, his splits analysis shows that he performed slower than the average in Running 1, Ski Erg, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Running 3, and Running 2. These segments were the areas where he lost the most time.
10. Running 2: Ren Nijhuis was 00:14 slower than the average for this segment. To improve his performance in this area, he should continue to work on his running speed and endurance. Incorporating hill training and tempo runs can help improve his performance in this segment.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the areas of improvement identified, Ren Nijhuis can enhance his performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clarke Paul | 2024 London | 01:56:44 | |
| Viannei Massimo | 2024 Turin | 01:56:19 | |
| Sarasi Guido | 2023 Milan | 01:56:17 | |
| Ortega Fernando | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:57:04 | |
| Chollet Mickael | 2023 Paris | 01:57:11 | |
| Rachal Ryan | 2023 Houston | 01:56:15 | |
| Tümay Salman | 2024 Berlin | 01:56:24 | |
| Tilch Peter | 2024 Hamburg | 01:57:14 | |
| Bowen Stevie | 2023 Manchester | 01:56:19 | |
| Quinlivan Conor | 2024 Melbourne | 01:56:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
