Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Goncalves Phillip's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Goncalves Phillip's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Goncalves Phillip's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Goncalves Phillip's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:40 | 06:46 to 05:06 | 32.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:31 | 05:38 to 04:07 | 29.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:54 | 05:02 to 04:08 | 17.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:35 | 04:33 to 03:58 | 11.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 | 02:38 to 02:18 | 6.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:51 to 01:47 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:35 to 36:35 | 0.0% |
| Goncalves Phillip | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:52 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 04:52 | 04:19 -00:17 | 04:18 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 04:08 | 08:54 | 04:34 -00:26 | 08:37 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 13:02 | 02:37 +00:01 | 13:11 -00:09 |
| Running 3 | 04:21 | 15:40 | 04:57 -00:36 | 15:48 -00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 20:01 | 04:22 +00:11 | 20:45 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 04:26 | 24:34 | 04:55 -00:29 | 25:07 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:38 | 29:00 | 04:35 +01:03 | 30:02 -01:02 |
| Running 5 | 04:34 | 34:38 | 05:03 -00:29 | 34:37 +00:01 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 39:12 | 04:37 -00:08 | 39:40 -00:28 |
| Running 6 | 04:39 | 43:41 | 04:57 -00:18 | 44:17 -00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 48:20 | 01:59 -00:08 | 49:14 -00:54 |
| Running 7 | 04:31 | 50:11 | 04:55 -00:24 | 51:13 -01:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:02 | 54:42 | 04:30 +00:32 | 56:08 -01:26 |
| Running 8 | 05:08 | 59:44 | 05:23 -00:15 | 01:00:38 -00:54 |
| Wall Balls | 06:46 | 01:04:52 | 05:40 +01:06 | 01:06:01 -01:09 |
| Roxzone | 06:01 | 01:17:30 | 05:49 +00:12 | 01:17:30 |
Phillip Goncalves demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham event. Falling within the top 17% of total athletes and top 19% within his age group, his endurance and strength are evident. Particularly noteworthy, is his total running time, which was faster than average by 02:43. Phillip's overall performance indicates a strong runner profile, with consistent above-average time across all running segments. However, his pacing seems to have been inconsistent with him starting slower than average on running 1 but improving significantly in subsequent segments. This suggests a possible need for better pacing strategy at the start of the race.
The areas that require the most attention for improvement, based on Phillip's performance against the 25th percentile, are the following:
To improve upon his race performance, Phillip may focus on the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Donatiello David | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:17:40 | |
| Shaw Joe | 2023 London | 01:17:48 | |
| Scharr Sven | 2021 Leipzig | 01:17:58 | |
| Wieking Birger | 2024 Berlin | 01:17:23 | |
| Pasquali Simone | 2023 Milan | 01:17:17 | |
| Oriordan Darren | 2023 Dubai | 01:17:59 | |
| Bahadorvand Hamun | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:17:08 | |
| Harding Greg | 2023 Glasgow | 01:17:59 | |
| Roberts David | 2024 Glasgow | 01:17:18 | |
| Moratiel Miguel | 2024 Madrid | 01:17:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
