Starks Gemma Performance Analysis

Dive into the performance of this athlete for 2023 Birmingham with this analyzer. We look at the performance of similar athletes to assess where are the weakness and the strengths of this athlete. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 34 similar athletes.

When comparing two athletes, remember that differing race track layouts can affect their running and roxzone times. The best strategy is to compare athletes who have raced in the same event.

Back to Starks Gemma view Ivers Shannon's full profile

Season 6 2023 Birmingham (1902) HYROX PRO (34) Starks Gemma

GBR W 40-44 #161005 01:54:06 18th in AG | Top 52.9% 74th | Top 37.2%

Performance Highlights

Workout Total 48:34 -03:15
Running Total 57:25 +04:02
Roxzone 08:13 -00:46
Average Lap 07:11 +00:32
Best Lap 04:23 -01:07

Running

We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. Each segment’s time difference is highlighted: green for faster segments, red for slower ones. This gives a clear view of strengths and areas to improve, tailored to relevant performance peers.

Workouts

We break down workout times by comparing the athlete’s performance to others with matching finish times. Each workout segment displays a time difference: green for quicker and red for slower, offering a targeted look at competitive strengths and areas to refine.

Pacing Quality

This section showcases the entire Starks Gemma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average. It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Starks Gemma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast (line below 0) or too slow (line above 0), guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.

Spread of Splits Time

This box plot illustrates the spread of splits for similar athletes, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Starks Gemma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement. The chart include Top 10%, 25%, Median, and Bottom 25%, 10% of the distribution.

Improvement Plan

Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. We looked at the results of similar athletes to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Starks Gemma's time.

The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.

A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.

Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.

Station Percentile Rank Potential Improvement Focus During Training
Run Total 79 07:35 59.6%
Burpees Broad Jump 94 02:37 20.6%
Sled Pull 38 00:44 5.8%
Sled Push 44 00:39 5.1%
Wall Balls 35 00:26 3.4%
Roxzone 32 00:26 3.4%
Farmers Carry 47 00:16 2.1%
Ski Erg 4 00:00 0.0%
Rowing 13 00:00 0.0%
Sandbag Lunges 16 00:00 0.0%

Progression Chart

Splits Time

Splits Time Time from Similar Athletes
Gemma Shannon Total Time Average Total Time
Running 1 04:23 πŸ† 05:33 04:23 05:24 -01:01 05:24 -01:01
Ski Erg 04:42 πŸ† 04:53 09:05 05:14 -00:32 10:38 -01:33
Running 2 06:57 06:31 πŸ† 16:02 06:16 +00:41 16:54 -00:52
Sled Push 04:57 03:43 πŸ† 20:59 05:39 -00:42 22:33 -01:34
Running 3 07:08 07:03 πŸ† 28:07 06:42 +00:26 29:15 -01:08
Sled Pull 08:15 06:35 πŸ† 36:22 09:23 -01:08 38:38 -02:16
Running 4 07:24 πŸ† 07:32 43:46 06:41 +00:43 45:19 -01:33
Burpees Broad Jump 08:48 πŸ† 09:02 52:34 06:54 +01:54 52:13 +00:21
Running 5 07:56 07:39 πŸ† 01:00:30 06:53 +01:03 59:06 +01:24
Rowing 05:11 πŸ† 05:43 01:05:41 05:33 -00:22 01:04:39 +01:02
Running 6 07:45 07:45 01:13:26 06:47 +00:58 01:11:26 +02:00
Farmers Carry 03:13 03:06 πŸ† 01:16:39 03:23 -00:10 01:14:49 +01:50
Running 7 07:28 πŸ† 07:53 01:24:07 06:47 +00:41 01:21:36 +02:31
Sandbag Lunges 06:02 πŸ† 06:12 01:30:09 07:14 -01:12 01:28:50 +01:19
Running 8 08:27 πŸ† 09:39 01:38:36 07:48 +00:39 01:36:38 +01:58
Wall Balls 07:26 07:00 πŸ† 01:46:02 08:29 -01:03 01:45:07 +00:55
Roxzone 08:13 πŸ† 08:47 01:54:06 08:59 -00:46 01:54:06

Comparing with 34 athletes

A word from your coach
Loading...

Loading...
Analysing the result... Wait a few second...
Similar Athletes
Torres Carla 2024 Ciudad de Mexico 01:53:38 Compare
Leo Yun Wei 2024 Singapore National Stadium 01:53:40 Compare
Blenis Morgan 2021 Chicago 01:53:45 Compare
Geßler Nathalie 2023 München 01:53:45 Compare
Hernandez Nuria 2022 Los Angeles 01:53:49 Compare
Gomez Taylor 2022 Los Angeles 01:53:49 Compare
Fat Adry 2024 Ciudad de Mexico 01:53:50 Compare
Aichele Vanessa 2020 Karlsruhe 01:53:52 Compare
Recine Daniela 2024 Rimini 01:53:53 Compare
Hundt Nathalie 2023 World Championships Manchester 01:53:55 Compare

Measure Your Performance Against Top Athletes

Other Results from this athlete
No other results found for this athlete.

Ready to conquer your next race?

Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.

Pace Calculator

Share Your Result on Instagram

We've generated the perfect instagram story for you. Don't forget to tag us @roxcoach and redirect to your result page.

Download

Embrace Your Post-Race Recovery Journey

Discover the art of recovery with our expert tips. Tailored for Hyrox athletes, our guide ensures you rejuvenate effectively and return stronger for your next challenge.

Start My Recovery Plan