Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rae Emily's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rae Emily's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rae Emily's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rae Emily's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 03:42 | 09:07 to 05:25 | 66.9% |
| Run Total | 00:55 | 46:16 to 45:21 | 16.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 03:08 to 02:35 | 9.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:22 | 06:12 to 05:50 | 6.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:43 to 01:43 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Rae Emily | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 05:09 -00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 04:15 | 05:09 -00:06 | 05:09 -00:54 |
| Running 2 | 05:49 | 09:18 | 05:30 +00:19 | 10:18 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 15:07 | 02:45 +00:23 | 15:48 -00:41 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 18:15 | 05:48 +00:20 | 18:33 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 09:07 | 24:23 | 05:51 +03:16 | 24:21 +00:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:00 | 33:30 | 05:50 +00:10 | 30:12 +03:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:12 | 39:30 | 06:13 -00:01 | 36:02 +03:28 |
| Running 5 | 06:08 | 45:42 | 05:58 +00:10 | 42:15 +03:27 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 51:50 | 05:24 -00:18 | 48:13 +03:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 56:56 | 05:52 +00:04 | 53:37 +03:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:43 | 01:02:52 | 02:15 -00:32 | 59:29 +03:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 01:04:35 | 05:51 +00:04 | 01:01:44 +02:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:01 | 01:10:30 | 04:52 -00:51 | 01:07:35 +02:55 |
| Running 8 | 06:07 | 01:14:31 | 06:16 -00:09 | 01:12:27 +02:04 |
| Wall Balls | 03:48 | 01:20:38 | 05:00 -01:12 | 01:18:43 +01:55 |
| Roxzone | 06:21 | 01:30:40 | 06:57 -00:36 | 01:30:40 |
Emily's total running time of 00:46:16 is 01:06 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she could benefit from improving her running speed and efficiency. Additionally, her best running lap of 00:04:15 was 00:48 faster than average, suggesting that she has the potential to perform well in running segments.
In conclusion, Emily Rae had a strong performance in the HYROX race, but there are areas where she can make improvements. By focusing on improving her running speed and efficiency, particularly in the identified segments, and implementing effective race strategies, she can further enhance her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price Alexandra | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:33 | |
| Clarke Bella | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:39 | |
| Schlump Patricia | 2024 Köln | 01:30:49 | |
| Newby Ali | 2023 New York | 01:30:23 | |
| Wolin Elyse | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:31:08 | |
| Watters Olivia | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:30:30 | |
| Harris Emily | 2023 Malaga | 01:30:50 | |
| Cusumano Lesley | 2022 Chicago | 01:30:31 | |
| Hamilton Julie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:34 | |
| Lehmann Jennifer | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:30:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
