Fricker Mark Performance Analysis

Dive into the performance of this athlete for 2023 Birmingham with this analyzer. We look at the performance of similar athletes to assess where are the weakness and the strengths of this athlete. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 484 similar athletes.

When comparing two athletes, remember that differing race track layouts can affect their running and roxzone times. The best strategy is to compare athletes who have raced in the same event.

Back to Fricker Mark view Fricker Mark's full profile

Season 6 2023 Birmingham (1902) HYROX PRO (9) Fricker Mark

GBR M 50-54 #205017 01:25:52 πŸ₯‡ in AG | Top 11.1% 68th | Top 34.2%

Performance Highlights

Workout Total 47:00 +08:06
Running Total 34:27 -06:14
Roxzone 04:32 -01:45
Average Lap 04:18 -00:47
Best Lap 03:09 -01:05

Running

We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. Each segment’s time difference is highlighted: green for faster segments, red for slower ones. This gives a clear view of strengths and areas to improve, tailored to relevant performance peers.

Workouts

We break down workout times by comparing the athlete’s performance to others with matching finish times. Each workout segment displays a time difference: green for quicker and red for slower, offering a targeted look at competitive strengths and areas to refine.

Pacing Quality

This section showcases the entire Fricker Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average. It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fricker Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast (line below 0) or too slow (line above 0), guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.

Spread of Splits Time

This box plot illustrates the spread of splits for similar athletes, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fricker Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement. The chart include Top 10%, 25%, Median, and Bottom 25%, 10% of the distribution.

Improvement Plan

Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. We looked at the results of similar athletes to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fricker Mark's time.

The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.

A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.

Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.

Station Percentile Rank Potential Improvement Focus During Training
Wall Balls 94 03:40 29.3%
Sled Pull 88 02:50 22.6%
Sled Push 94 02:28 19.7%
Sandbag Lunges 90 01:39 13.2%
Burpees Broad Jump 78 01:22 10.9%
Ski Erg 65 00:14 1.9%
Farmers Carry 44 00:12 1.6%
Rowing 42 00:06 0.8%
Roxzone 8 00:00 0.0%
Run Total 2 00:00 0.0%

Progression Chart

Splits Time

Splits Time Time from Similar Athletes
Mark Mark Total Time Average Total Time
Running 1 03:09 πŸ† 05:20 03:09 04:15 -01:06 04:15 -01:06
Ski Erg 04:21 04:18 πŸ† 07:30 04:15 +00:06 08:30 -01:00
Running 2 04:20 πŸ† 04:40 11:50 04:39 -00:19 13:09 -01:19
Sled Push 05:40 03:34 πŸ† 17:30 03:54 +01:46 17:03 +00:27
Running 3 04:19 πŸ† 05:06 21:49 05:11 -00:52 22:14 -00:25
Sled Pull 08:30 05:06 πŸ† 30:19 06:39 +01:51 28:53 +01:26
Running 4 04:27 πŸ† 04:50 34:46 05:10 -00:43 34:03 +00:43
Burpees Broad Jump 05:19 πŸ† 06:52 40:05 04:33 +00:46 38:36 +01:29
Running 5 04:26 πŸ† 04:46 44:31 05:15 -00:49 43:51 +00:40
Rowing 04:34 πŸ† 04:43 49:05 04:37 -00:03 48:28 +00:37
Running 6 04:26 πŸ† 04:50 53:31 05:09 -00:43 53:37 -00:06
Farmers Carry 02:20 01:48 πŸ† 55:51 02:25 -00:05 56:02 -00:11
Running 7 04:25 πŸ† 04:51 01:00:16 05:13 -00:48 01:01:15 -00:59
Sandbag Lunges 06:25 πŸ† 06:34 01:06:41 05:20 +01:05 01:06:35 +00:06
Running 8 04:58 πŸ† 05:29 01:11:39 05:49 -00:51 01:12:24 -00:45
Wall Balls 09:51 07:31 πŸ† 01:21:30 07:11 +02:40 01:19:35 +01:55
Roxzone 04:32 04:03 πŸ† 01:25:52 06:17 -01:45 01:25:52

Comparing with 484 athletes

A word from your coach
Loading...

Loading...
Analysing the result... Wait a few second...
Similar Athletes
Forisch Roland 2019 Leipzig 01:25:22 Compare
Simpkins Matthew 2024 Birmingham 01:25:22 Compare
Speight Ashley 2024 Birmingham 01:25:22 Compare
Liebl Martin 2019 Wien 01:25:23 Compare
Fallek Alexander 2021 Dallas 01:25:23 Compare
Johnson Mario 2022 Las Vegas 01:25:23 Compare
Nordmeier Jens 2022 Las Vegas 01:25:23 Compare
Bramwell Tom 2022 Birmingham 01:25:23 Compare
Fehn Andreas 2024 Karlsruhe 01:25:23 Compare
Viero Patrizio 2024 World Championships Nice 01:25:23 Compare

Measure Your Performance Against Top Athletes

Other Results from this athlete
2022 London 01:16:31 Compare
2023 London 01:13:22 Compare
2023 Manchester 01:24:14 Compare

Ready to conquer your next race?

Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.

Pace Calculator

Share Your Result on Instagram

We've generated the perfect instagram story for you. Don't forget to tag us @roxcoach and redirect to your result page.

Download

Embrace Your Post-Race Recovery Journey

Discover the art of recovery with our expert tips. Tailored for Hyrox athletes, our guide ensures you rejuvenate effectively and return stronger for your next challenge.

Start My Recovery Plan