Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:20 (From 07:33 to 05:13) | 66.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:57 (From 04:00 to 03:03) | 26.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 (From 04:44 to 04:32) | 5.7% |
| Rowing | 00:03 (From 04:58 to 04:55) | 1.4% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 05:45 to 05:45) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:15 to 02:15) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 05:05 to 05:05) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 06:46 to 06:46) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 42:55 to 42:55) | 0.0% |
| Uff Alex | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:33 | 00:00 | 04:51 -01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 03:33 | 04:33 +00:11 | 04:51 -01:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 08:17 | 05:18 -00:08 | 09:24 -01:07 |
| Sled Push | 04:00 | 13:27 | 03:08 +00:52 | 14:42 -01:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:17 | 17:27 | 05:45 -00:28 | 17:50 -00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 07:33 | 22:44 | 05:25 +02:08 | 23:35 -00:51 |
| Running 4 | 06:59 | 30:17 | 05:46 +01:13 | 29:00 +01:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:45 | 37:16 | 06:00 -00:15 | 34:46 +02:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 43:01 | 05:57 -00:37 | 40:46 +02:15 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 48:21 | 04:58 +00:00 | 46:43 +01:38 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 53:19 | 05:49 -00:38 | 51:41 +01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 58:30 | 02:22 -00:07 | 57:30 +01:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:07 | 01:00:45 | 05:47 -00:40 | 59:52 +00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:05 | 01:05:52 | 05:37 -00:32 | 01:05:39 +00:13 |
| Running 8 | 06:21 | 01:10:57 | 06:35 -00:14 | 01:11:16 -00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:46 | 01:17:18 | 07:16 -00:30 | 01:17:51 -00:33 |
| Roxzone | 08:58 | 01:32:56 | 07:49 +01:09 | 01:32:56 |
Alex Uff demonstrated notable running prowess in the 2024 Paris HYROX race. He finished in the top 67% overall and top 73% in his age group of 30-34. His overall time was 01:32:56, with a total running time of 00:42:55, which was a commendable 03:08 faster than the average. His best running lap was 00:05:07.
Upon analyzing his pacing, Alex started the race faster than the average, which is evident in his Running 1 performance, where he clocked 01:17 faster than average. However, towards the end, specifically in Running 4, his pace dropped, timing 01:11 slower than average. This suggests that Alex may benefit from better pacing strategies to maintain his initial speed throughout the race.
Interestingly, Alex appears to have more of a runner profile than a strength-based one. This is highlighted by his faster total running time and slower performances in strength-focused segments like the Sled Push and Sled Pull. Thus, he may need to focus more on strength training to enhance his overall performance.
Given Alex's runner profile, he could benefit from better pacing strategies. Instead of starting too fast, he could aim for a steady pace throughout the race, saving energy for the later segments. This could help prevent a drop in speed as seen in Running 4.
Furthermore, Alex should work on improving his transition times in the Roxzone. This could involve practicing quick transitions between exercises and minimizing rest times. With a focus on this aspect, he may be able to shave crucial seconds off his overall time.
Lastly, incorporating more strength training into his routine could help balance his performance. As seen in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, Alex has room for improvement in this area. By focusing on both upper and lower body strength exercises, he may be able to enhance his performance in these segments and overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Müllner Martin | 2018 Wien | 01:32:59 | |
| Harper Tod | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:33:06 | |
| Holland James | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:32 | |
| FergusonSmith Lachlan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:01 | |
| Lünig Sascha | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:32:55 | |
| Lenehan Nathan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:16 | |
| Staack Bjarne | 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:35 | |
| M'Bodj Ama | 2024 Köln | 01:33:07 | |
| Joly Martin | 2024 Paris | 01:32:54 | |
| Peters Simon | 2024 London | 01:32:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Uff Alex
