Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mitchell Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mitchell Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mitchell Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mitchell Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:44 | 06:32 to 04:48 | 47.7% |
| Run Total | 01:25 | 42:54 to 41:29 | 39.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:24 | 06:25 to 06:01 | 11.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:05 to 02:02 | 1.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:43 to 02:41 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Mitchell Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:22 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 05:22 | 04:26 -00:16 | 04:35 +00:47 |
| Running 2 | 04:31 | 09:32 | 04:57 -00:26 | 09:01 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 14:03 | 02:52 -00:09 | 13:58 +00:05 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 16:46 | 05:23 -00:24 | 16:50 -00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 21:45 | 04:54 -00:31 | 22:13 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 26:08 | 05:21 -00:27 | 27:07 -00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:43 | 31:02 | 05:17 -00:34 | 32:28 -01:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:19 | 35:45 | 05:31 -00:12 | 37:45 -02:00 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 41:04 | 04:49 -00:15 | 43:16 -02:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:32 | 45:38 | 05:22 +00:10 | 48:05 -02:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 51:10 | 02:10 -00:05 | 53:27 -02:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 53:15 | 05:22 +00:17 | 55:37 -02:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:32 | 58:54 | 05:05 +01:27 | 01:00:59 -02:05 |
| Running 8 | 06:42 | 01:05:26 | 05:58 +00:44 | 01:06:04 -00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 06:25 | 01:12:08 | 06:29 -00:04 | 01:12:02 +00:06 |
| Roxzone | 06:55 | 01:25:19 | 06:48 +00:07 | 01:25:19 |
Thomas Mitchell showed a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, ranking in the top 32% of all athletes and the top 37% within his age group. His total running time was 42:54, which was just 9 seconds slower than the average. This hints at a slight inclination towards a strength athlete profile, as his running pace was slightly below average.
Thomas demonstrated an impressive performance in the early stages of the race, running faster than the average in the second, third, and fourth segments. However, it appears he may have started off too fast, as his pace began to slow down in the latter stages of the race, particularly during Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8.
Given his early speed and later slowdown, Thomas may benefit from a more conservative start to the race, preserving energy for the latter stages. This approach may help him maintain a more consistent pace throughout the race, particularly during the final running segments. Furthermore, focusing on swift and efficient transitions between exercises could help reduce time spent in the Roxzone, contributing to an improved overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pickersgill Shane | 2024 Poznan | 01:25:44 | |
| Mcginn Peter | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:03 | |
| Carey Michael | 2024 Dublin | 01:25:30 | |
| Bolleboom Nico | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:59 | |
| Glavas Robert | 2023 Wien | 01:25:37 | |
| Dunford Steve | 2023 Singapore | 01:25:00 | |
| Bohne Robin | 2022 Bremen | 01:25:09 | |
| Thomas Dean | 2024 London | 01:25:14 | |
| González Vilar Roi | 2023 Malaga | 01:24:57 | |
| Rimmer Jack | 2023 Madrid | 01:25:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
