Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rimmer Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rimmer Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rimmer Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rimmer Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:27 | 45:56 to 41:29 | 57.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:25 | 07:13 to 04:48 | 31.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:18 | 02:59 to 02:41 | 3.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:37 to 04:22 | 3.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 | 04:49 to 04:36 | 2.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:07 to 02:02 | 1.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:52 to 05:52 | 0.0% |
| Rimmer Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:33 | 00:00 | 04:36 -01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 03:33 | 04:26 +00:11 | 04:36 -01:03 |
| Running 2 | 07:44 | 08:10 | 04:56 +02:48 | 09:02 -00:52 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 15:54 | 02:53 +00:06 | 13:58 +01:56 |
| Running 3 | 08:15 | 18:53 | 05:22 +02:53 | 16:51 +02:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 27:08 | 04:55 -00:06 | 22:13 +04:55 |
| Running 4 | 04:27 | 31:57 | 05:20 -00:53 | 27:08 +04:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:00 | 36:24 | 05:18 -01:18 | 32:28 +03:56 |
| Running 5 | 04:25 | 40:24 | 05:30 -01:05 | 37:46 +02:38 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 44:49 | 04:49 -00:08 | 43:16 +01:33 |
| Running 6 | 04:25 | 49:30 | 05:22 -00:57 | 48:05 +01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 53:55 | 02:11 -00:04 | 53:27 +00:28 |
| Running 7 | 07:42 | 56:02 | 05:21 +02:21 | 55:38 +00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:13 | 01:03:44 | 05:06 +02:07 | 01:00:59 +02:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:29 | 01:10:57 | 05:57 -00:28 | 01:06:05 +04:52 |
| Wall Balls | 05:52 | 01:16:26 | 06:30 -00:38 | 01:12:02 +04:24 |
| Roxzone | 03:16 | 01:25:24 | 06:52 -03:36 | 01:25:24 |
In terms of pacing, Jack's splits indicate that he performed well in some segments, while there is room for improvement in others. His best running lap was completed in 00:03:33, which was 00:55 faster than average. This suggests that Jack has good speed and endurance in short bursts of running. However, his total running time was 04:39 slower than average, indicating that he may need to work on maintaining pace and endurance over longer distances.
Additionally, Jack should pay attention to his transitions in the Roxzone. By practicing quick and efficient transitions during training, he can minimize the time spent in the Roxzone and gain an advantage over his competitors.
Incorporating interval training, strength exercises, and specific drills targeting the identified areas of improvement will help Jack enhance his performance and achieve better results in future Hyrox races. It is important for him to maintain a well-rounded training program that focuses on both running and strength training to improve his overall performance and achieve his goals.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Peet Mathew | 2022 Manchester | 01:24:55 | |
| Regli Marco | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:25:33 | |
| Usher Ben | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:50 | |
| Barham Mike | 2024 Dallas | 01:25:43 | |
| Welzel Knut | 2023 Hamburg | 01:25:38 | |
| Schenkelberg Uwe | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:54 | |
| Fields Matthew | 2024 Dallas | 01:25:53 | |
| Serrano Bruno | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:48 | |
| Reid Dave | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:13 | |
| Bauer Thomas | 2022 Essen | 01:25:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
