Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:26 | 07:38 to 05:12 | 54.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:50 | 04:52 to 04:02 | 18.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:41 | 02:29 to 01:48 | 15.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 02:37 to 02:20 | 6.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:24 to 04:13 | 4.1% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:35 to 04:32 | 1.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:01 | 04:13 to 04:12 | 0.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:16 to 37:16 | 0.0% |
| Smith Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 05:06 | 04:19 +00:05 | 04:18 +00:48 |
| Running 2 | 04:15 | 09:30 | 04:37 -00:22 | 08:37 +00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 13:45 | 02:40 -00:03 | 13:14 +00:31 |
| Running 3 | 04:23 | 16:22 | 05:00 -00:37 | 15:54 +00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 20:45 | 04:26 +00:26 | 20:54 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 04:42 | 25:37 | 04:59 -00:17 | 25:20 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:13 | 30:19 | 04:37 -00:24 | 30:19 +00:00 |
| Running 5 | 04:41 | 34:32 | 05:07 -00:26 | 34:56 -00:24 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 39:13 | 04:38 -00:03 | 40:03 -00:50 |
| Running 6 | 04:34 | 43:48 | 05:00 -00:26 | 44:41 -00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 48:22 | 02:00 +00:29 | 49:41 -01:19 |
| Running 7 | 04:35 | 50:51 | 05:00 -00:25 | 51:41 -00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:09 | 55:26 | 04:34 -00:25 | 56:41 -01:15 |
| Running 8 | 05:02 | 59:35 | 05:26 -00:24 | 01:01:15 -01:40 |
| Wall Balls | 07:38 | 01:04:37 | 05:44 +01:54 | 01:06:41 -02:04 |
| Roxzone | 06:13 | 01:18:21 | 05:56 +00:17 | 01:18:21 |
Matthew Smith has demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. Being in the top 19% of all athletes and the top 24% in his age group (25-29) is an impressive accomplishment. His overall time of 01:18:21 indicates a high level of fitness and competitive spirit.
Matthew's total running time was 00:37:16, which is 02:27 faster than the average running time. This suggests that Matthew has a strong runner profile. He excelled in most of the running segments, consistently finishing faster than average. However, it's worth noting that his performance in the first running segment was slower than average, indicating a cautious start.
On the other hand, his Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating that he took more time for transitions and rest. This is an area where he can shave off some valuable seconds with strategic improvements.
For future races, Matthew could consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Heald John | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:07 | |
| Long Samuel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:54 | |
| Anders Nils | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:18:22 | |
| Herrera Diego | 2023 Barcelona | 01:18:46 | |
| Snow Christopher | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:31 | |
| Rodríguez Alonso Ismael | 2024 Malaga | 01:18:05 | |
| Suzuki Sho | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:18:26 | |
| Sofia Jacopo Sergio | 2024 Turin | 01:18:05 | |
| Walker Kai | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:18:40 | |
| Petzold Marcel | 2022 Leipzig | 01:18:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Barcelona | 01:46:13 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:49:05 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 02:07:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
