Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 194 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Bemmel Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Bemmel Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Bemmel Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Bemmel Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 18:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 17:30 | 01:14:51 to 57:21 | 95.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 09:26 to 08:38 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:16 to 03:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:57 to 05:57 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:06 to 08:06 | 0.0% |
| Van Bemmel Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:32 | 00:00 | 05:52 -01:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 04:32 | 05:00 -00:14 | 05:52 -01:20 |
| Running 2 | 06:32 | 09:18 | 06:41 -00:09 | 10:52 -01:34 |
| Sled Push | 03:16 | 15:50 | 04:08 -00:52 | 17:33 -01:43 |
| Running 3 | 06:57 | 19:06 | 07:52 -00:55 | 21:41 -02:35 |
| Sled Pull | 05:17 | 26:03 | 07:26 -02:09 | 29:33 -03:30 |
| Running 4 | 08:14 | 31:20 | 07:54 +00:20 | 36:59 -05:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:26 | 39:34 | 08:57 +00:29 | 44:53 -05:19 |
| Running 5 | 11:58 | 49:00 | 08:26 +03:32 | 53:50 -04:50 |
| Rowing | 05:23 | 01:00:58 | 05:43 -00:20 | 01:02:16 -01:18 |
| Running 6 | 11:39 | 01:06:21 | 07:57 +03:42 | 01:07:59 -01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 01:18:00 | 03:04 -00:45 | 01:15:56 +02:04 |
| Running 7 | 11:49 | 01:20:19 | 08:01 +03:48 | 01:19:00 +01:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:57 | 01:32:08 | 08:39 -02:42 | 01:27:01 +05:07 |
| Running 8 | 13:14 | 01:38:05 | 10:54 +02:20 | 01:35:40 +02:25 |
| Wall Balls | 08:06 | 01:51:19 | 11:17 -03:11 | 01:46:34 +04:45 |
| Roxzone | 09:59 | 02:09:16 | 11:25 -01:26 | 02:09:16 |
Mark Van Bemmel participated in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race and achieved an overall rank of 2177, placing him in the top 69% of all athletes, and 441st in his age group, putting him in the top 70% for his category. His overall time was 02:09:16. While Mark showed strength in various exercise zones like the Sled Pull and Sandbag Lunges, his total running time was 01:14:51, which is 10:32 slower than the average, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Furthermore, analyzing his initial running segments, Mark started the race with a fast pace, evident from his Running 1 being 01:10 faster than average (9th percentile rank). However, his pace significantly dropped in later running segments, suggesting that he may have started too quickly and was unable to maintain that speed. Mark can be categorized as having a hybrid profile, with a need to improve endurance in longer running segments while maintaining his strength in exercise zones.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tiernan Richard | 2023 Dublin | 02:09:27 | |
| Mostert Steven | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:09:34 | |
| Lee Seongjin | 2024 Singapore | 02:09:27 | |
| Tutai Stan | 2024 Sydney | 02:09:44 | |
| Lilley Steve | 2022 Birmingham | 02:09:01 | |
| Oo Daryl | 2023 Singapore | 02:09:17 | |
| Mantel Dimitri | 2024 Paris | 02:09:45 | |
| Thomas David | 2024 London | 02:09:03 | |
| Omahony Shaun | 2023 Birmingham | 02:09:34 | |
| Watt Andy | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 02:09:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
