Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 782 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Odegaard Dana's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Odegaard Dana's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Odegaard Dana's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Odegaard Dana's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:54 | 53:57 to 50:03 | 66.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:01 | 07:23 to 06:22 | 17.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 03:25 to 03:01 | 6.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:40 to 02:25 | 4.3% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:45 to 05:36 | 2.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:06 | 07:12 to 07:06 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 05:20 to 05:18 | 0.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Odegaard Dana | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:16 | 00:00 | 05:29 +00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:20 | 06:16 | 05:20 +00:00 | 05:29 +00:47 |
| Running 2 | 06:16 | 11:36 | 06:01 +00:15 | 10:49 +00:47 |
| Sled Push | 03:25 | 17:52 | 03:05 +00:20 | 16:50 +01:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:20 | 21:17 | 06:24 -00:04 | 19:55 +01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 07:23 | 27:37 | 06:30 +00:53 | 26:19 +01:18 |
| Running 4 | 06:30 | 35:00 | 06:27 +00:03 | 32:49 +02:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:12 | 41:30 | 07:14 -00:02 | 39:16 +02:14 |
| Running 5 | 07:08 | 48:42 | 06:36 +00:32 | 46:30 +02:12 |
| Rowing | 05:45 | 55:50 | 05:38 +00:07 | 53:06 +02:44 |
| Running 6 | 06:45 | 01:01:35 | 06:29 +00:16 | 58:44 +02:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:40 | 01:08:20 | 02:29 +00:11 | 01:05:13 +03:07 |
| Running 7 | 07:03 | 01:11:00 | 06:27 +00:36 | 01:07:42 +03:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:10 | 01:18:03 | 05:34 -00:24 | 01:14:09 +03:54 |
| Running 8 | 07:39 | 01:23:13 | 07:11 +00:28 | 01:19:43 +03:30 |
| Wall Balls | 04:59 | 01:30:52 | 05:51 -00:52 | 01:26:54 +03:58 |
| Roxzone | 05:08 | 01:40:59 | 08:14 -03:06 | 01:40:59 |
Dana's total running time of 00:00:00 indicates that she was 49 minutes and 48 seconds faster than the average for her finish time. This suggests that she has a strong running profile and excelled in this aspect of the race. Her best running lap was 00:06:16, which was only 1 minute slower than the average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lankhorst Kristel | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:41:10 | |
| Shevchuk Marharyta | 2024 Poznan | 01:40:33 | |
| Czerzynska Joanna | 2023 Warschau | 01:41:08 | |
| Köstinger Bianca | 2019 Wien | 01:41:18 | |
| Cusick Hayley | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:40:53 | |
| Pagano Diane | 2020 Dallas | 01:41:20 | |
| Marcelissen Yvonne | 2024 Maastricht | 01:40:44 | |
| Walsh Emma | 2024 Dublin | 01:40:47 | |
| Linger Suzanne | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:41:17 | |
| Grill Christiane | 2022 Wien | 01:41:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:36:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
