Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wright Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wright Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wright Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wright Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:16 | 07:02 to 04:46 | 47.1% |
| Run Total | 02:02 | 43:50 to 41:48 | 42.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:18 | 02:34 to 02:16 | 6.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:12 | 04:01 to 03:49 | 4.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:52 to 04:51 | 0.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:39 to 03:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Wright Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:26 | 00:00 | 04:52 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 05:26 | 04:59 -00:07 | 04:52 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 10:18 | 05:10 -00:04 | 09:51 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:34 | 15:24 | 02:33 +00:01 | 15:01 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 17:58 | 05:26 -00:01 | 17:34 +00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 07:02 | 23:23 | 05:14 +01:48 | 23:00 +00:23 |
| Running 4 | 05:40 | 30:25 | 05:27 +00:13 | 28:14 +02:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:39 | 36:05 | 05:27 -01:48 | 33:41 +02:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 39:44 | 05:34 +00:07 | 39:08 +00:36 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 45:25 | 05:13 -00:12 | 44:42 +00:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 50:26 | 05:29 -00:01 | 49:55 +00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 55:54 | 02:07 -00:19 | 55:24 +00:30 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 57:42 | 05:27 -00:08 | 57:31 +00:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:52 | 01:03:01 | 04:21 -00:29 | 01:02:58 +00:03 |
| Running 8 | 05:48 | 01:06:53 | 05:48 +00:00 | 01:07:19 -00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 04:01 | 01:12:41 | 04:27 -00:26 | 01:13:07 -00:26 |
| Roxzone | 07:03 | 01:23:37 | 06:03 +01:00 | 01:23:37 |
In terms of her splits, Emma's total running time was 00:43:50, which was 01:29 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may need to improve her overall fitness and transition time. Her best running lap was 00:05:06, which shows that she is capable of running at a good pace.
In conclusion, Emma Wright had a strong performance in the HYROX race, placing in the top 8% overall and in her age group. To further improve her performance, she should focus on areas such as the sled pull, total running time, roxzone, running 1, and her best lap. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as strength training, interval training, and efficient transitions, Emma can enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Junghanns Tina | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:39 | |
| Brown Cara | 2024 Dublin | 01:23:14 | |
| Leung Yi Ling Elaine | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:23:45 | |
| Reineke Alice | 2019 Wien | 01:23:34 | |
| Greif Gabriella | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:29 | |
| Hayden Christie | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:23:25 | |
| Blaker Victoria | 2023 London | 01:23:11 | |
| Bartková Marcela | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:23:23 | |
| Munday Tilly | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:46 | |
| Giudice Veronica | 2023 London | 01:23:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Gdansk | 01:33:16 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:20:16 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:42:46 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:44 | |
| 2023 London | 01:33:36 | |
| 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:34:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
