Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wignall Jonny's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wignall Jonny's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wignall Jonny's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wignall Jonny's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:45 | 05:35 to 04:50 | 21.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:40 | 05:11 to 04:31 | 19.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:37 | 03:15 to 02:38 | 17.5% |
| Run Total | 00:32 | 41:31 to 40:59 | 15.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:25 | 05:07 to 04:42 | 11.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 06:18 to 05:53 | 11.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:05 to 02:00 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:23 to 04:21 | 0.9% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Wignall Jonny | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:19 | 00:00 | 04:33 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:19 | 04:25 -00:02 | 04:33 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 08:42 | 04:53 -00:08 | 08:58 -00:16 |
| Sled Push | 03:15 | 13:27 | 02:52 +00:23 | 13:51 -00:24 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 16:42 | 05:19 -00:20 | 16:43 -00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 05:11 | 21:41 | 04:50 +00:21 | 22:02 -00:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:14 | 26:52 | 05:17 -00:03 | 26:52 +00:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:35 | 32:06 | 05:11 +00:24 | 32:09 -00:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 37:41 | 05:27 -00:03 | 37:20 +00:21 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 43:05 | 04:47 -00:22 | 42:47 +00:18 |
| Running 6 | 05:27 | 47:30 | 05:18 +00:09 | 47:34 -00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 52:57 | 02:09 -00:04 | 52:52 +00:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 55:02 | 05:17 +00:10 | 55:01 +00:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:07 | 01:00:29 | 04:59 +00:08 | 01:00:18 +00:11 |
| Running 8 | 06:00 | 01:05:36 | 05:52 +00:08 | 01:05:17 +00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:18 | 01:11:36 | 06:17 +00:01 | 01:11:09 +00:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:19 | 01:24:05 | 06:39 -00:20 | 01:24:05 |
In terms of his pacing, Jonny showed consistency throughout the race, with some segments being faster than average and others being slightly slower. His overall running time of 00:41:31 was 53 seconds slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running performance. However, his best running lap time of 00:04:19 was 5 seconds faster than the average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in this area with the right training.
Overall, Jonny Wignall had a strong performance in the 2022 Manchester Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, specifically the Run Total segment, and addressing areas of weakness such as the Burpees Broad Jump and Sandbag Lunges, he can further enhance his overall performance in future races. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will also contribute to his success. With dedication and targeted training, Jonny has the potential to excel in upcoming Hyrox events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Luijendijk Andy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:14 | |
| Mcguinness Liam | 2023 London | 01:23:55 | |
| Cartwright Neil | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:20 | |
| Mcwilliams Craig | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:02 | |
| Garvey Billy | 2024 Sydney | 01:24:06 | |
| Andersen Marc | 2024 Stockholm | 01:24:09 | |
| Spinola Francesco | 2024 Milan | 01:24:07 | |
| Ehrenreich Clemens | 2023 Wien | 01:24:33 | |
| Guerin Alexandre | 2024 Paris | 01:24:03 | |
| Radici Giacomo | 2024 Milan | 01:24:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Birmingham | 01:32:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
