Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 972 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Paterson Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Paterson Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Paterson Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Paterson Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:38 | 53:23 to 49:45 | 52.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:04 | 09:00 to 06:56 | 29.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:17 | 07:41 to 06:24 | 18.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:23 to 06:23 | 0.0% |
| Paterson Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:31 | 00:00 | 05:19 -00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 04:31 | 04:43 -00:01 | 05:19 -00:48 |
| Running 2 | 05:45 | 09:13 | 05:48 -00:03 | 10:02 -00:49 |
| Sled Push | 03:31 | 14:58 | 03:34 -00:03 | 15:50 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 06:27 | 18:29 | 06:23 +00:04 | 19:24 -00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 04:53 | 24:56 | 06:10 -01:17 | 25:47 -00:51 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 29:49 | 06:22 +00:07 | 31:57 -02:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:00 | 36:18 | 07:03 +01:57 | 38:19 -02:01 |
| Running 5 | 07:03 | 45:18 | 06:38 +00:25 | 45:22 -00:04 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 52:21 | 05:14 -00:12 | 52:00 +00:21 |
| Running 6 | 06:32 | 57:23 | 06:28 +00:04 | 57:14 +00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 01:03:55 | 02:37 -00:43 | 01:03:42 +00:13 |
| Running 7 | 07:21 | 01:05:49 | 06:27 +00:54 | 01:06:19 -00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:41 | 01:13:10 | 06:36 +01:05 | 01:12:46 +00:24 |
| Running 8 | 09:19 | 01:20:51 | 07:36 +01:43 | 01:19:22 +01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 06:23 | 01:30:10 | 08:41 -02:18 | 01:26:58 +03:12 |
| Roxzone | 08:26 | 01:44:51 | 09:12 -00:46 | 01:44:51 |
From the splits analysis, we can see that Kevin performed well in some segments, such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where he was significantly faster than the average time. However, he struggled in segments like Burpees Broad Jump, Running 8, Sandbag Lunges, Running 7, and Running 5, where he lost considerable time compared to the average.
In conclusion, Kevin Paterson had a solid performance in the 2022 Manchester Hyrox race. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on specific segments where he lost considerable time compared to the average. By incorporating targeted training strategies and techniques, such as plyometrics, interval training, and strength exercises, he can enhance his performance in these areas. Additionally, he should focus on pacing himself properly, improving transition efficiency, and maintaining mental focus throughout the race. With these improvements, Kevin can strive for even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bingham Tom | 2023 London | 01:44:24 | |
| Cox Michael | 2022 London | 01:44:27 | |
| Chua Fabian | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:44:34 | |
| Haynes John | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:44:42 | |
| Casado Miguel | 2021 Madrid | 01:45:20 | |
| Perez Garcia Ricardo | 2024 Mexico City | 01:44:29 | |
| Zheng Lean | 2024 Milan | 01:44:32 | |
| Svärd Björn | 2023 Malmö | 01:44:33 | |
| Pimm Harrison | 2024 Brisbane | 01:45:00 | |
| 신 현재 | 2024 Incheon | 01:44:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
