Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nash Debrenda's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nash Debrenda's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nash Debrenda's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nash Debrenda's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:38 | 47:48 to 45:10 | 62.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:35 | 05:37 to 05:02 | 13.7% |
| Rowing | 00:26 | 05:43 to 05:17 | 10.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 02:53 to 02:34 | 7.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 04:52 to 04:35 | 6.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Nash Debrenda | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:56 | 00:00 | 05:09 -00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:37 | 04:56 | 05:07 +00:30 | 05:09 -00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:40 | 10:33 | 05:30 +00:10 | 10:16 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 16:13 | 02:44 +00:09 | 15:46 +00:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:57 | 19:06 | 05:47 +00:10 | 18:30 +00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 05:13 | 25:03 | 05:46 -00:33 | 24:17 +00:46 |
| Running 4 | 05:57 | 30:16 | 05:49 +00:08 | 30:03 +00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:50 | 36:13 | 06:08 -01:18 | 35:52 +00:21 |
| Running 5 | 06:06 | 41:03 | 05:57 +00:09 | 42:00 -00:57 |
| Rowing | 05:43 | 47:09 | 05:22 +00:21 | 47:57 -00:48 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 52:52 | 05:50 +00:14 | 53:19 -00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 58:56 | 02:15 -00:07 | 59:09 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 06:10 | 01:01:04 | 05:49 +00:21 | 01:01:24 -00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 01:07:14 | 04:46 +00:06 | 01:07:13 +00:01 |
| Running 8 | 07:01 | 01:12:06 | 06:14 +00:47 | 01:11:59 +00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 04:07 | 01:19:07 | 04:53 -00:46 | 01:18:13 +00:54 |
| Roxzone | 06:54 | 01:29:59 | 06:53 +00:01 | 01:29:59 |
Based on her splits analysis, Debrenda excelled in the Running 1 segment, completing it in 00:04:56, which was 00:03 faster than the average. She also performed exceptionally well in the Sled Push segment, finishing 00:14 faster than the average. Additionally, in the Burpees Broad Jump segment, she completed it 00:58 faster than the average.
However, there were several areas where Debrenda could improve her performance. The segments where she lost the most time compared to the average were Run Total, Running 8, Ski Erg, Rowing, Running 7, Roxzone, Running 2, and Running 6. These segments should be the focus of her training to enhance her overall performance in future races.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on improving the identified areas, Debrenda can enhance her performance in future Hyrox races and achieve even better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Biagioni Linda | 2024 Poznan | 01:29:58 | |
| Scholtens Charlotte | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:12 | |
| Kömives Lisa | 2022 Berlin | 01:30:04 | |
| Winchester Emma | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:42 | |
| Mögeltönder Jasmin | 2024 Berlin | 01:30:05 | |
| Iles Megan | 2024 London | 01:30:15 | |
| Di Luzio Maria Chiara | 2024 Milan | 01:29:45 | |
| List Tina | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:30:25 | |
| Maxfield Kirstie | 2022 London | 01:29:51 | |
| Hewit Lisa | 2024 Glasgow | 01:30:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Dallas | 01:40:53 | |
| 2024 Houston | 01:29:40 | |
| 2022 Dallas | 02:02:17 | |
| 2023 Dallas | 01:32:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
