Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Raschke Fabian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Raschke Fabian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Raschke Fabian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Raschke Fabian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:56 | 09:41 to 05:45 | 89.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:34 to 04:19 | 5.7% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:50 to 04:40 | 3.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:37 to 02:35 | 0.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:23 to 40:23 | 0.0% |
| Raschke Fabian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:00 | 00:00 | 04:29 -00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 04:00 | 04:24 +00:10 | 04:29 -00:29 |
| Running 2 | 04:49 | 08:34 | 04:52 -00:03 | 08:53 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 13:23 | 02:51 -00:14 | 13:45 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:02 | 16:00 | 05:16 -00:14 | 16:36 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 04:20 | 21:02 | 04:46 -00:26 | 21:52 -00:50 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 25:22 | 05:14 -00:20 | 26:38 -01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:27 | 30:16 | 05:02 -00:35 | 31:52 -01:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 34:43 | 05:24 +00:08 | 36:54 -02:11 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 40:15 | 04:45 +00:05 | 42:18 -02:03 |
| Running 6 | 05:02 | 45:05 | 05:16 -00:14 | 47:03 -01:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 50:07 | 02:07 -00:21 | 52:19 -02:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:08 | 51:53 | 05:15 -00:07 | 54:26 -02:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:36 | 57:01 | 04:54 -00:18 | 59:41 -02:40 |
| Running 8 | 05:59 | 01:01:37 | 05:47 +00:12 | 01:04:35 -02:58 |
| Wall Balls | 09:41 | 01:07:36 | 06:15 +03:26 | 01:10:22 -02:46 |
| Roxzone | 05:58 | 01:23:07 | 06:30 -00:32 | 01:23:07 |
Based on the splits analysis, Fabian's best performance was in the Sled Pull segment, where he was 00:47 faster than the average time. He also performed well in the Burpees Broad Jump and Farmers Carry segments, where he was 00:16 and 00:25 faster than average, respectively.
However, Fabian struggled in the Wall Balls segment, where he was 03:24 slower than the average time. He also lost time in the Run Total, Ski Erg, and Running 5 segments. These are the areas that require improvement to boost his overall performance.
In conclusion, Fabian Raschke performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on the identified segments for improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Fabian can work towards achieving better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennings Roy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:23:03 | |
| Donaghy Richard | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:59 | |
| Lehmann MarcAndré | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:23:17 | |
| Sageras Pedro | 2023 Bilbao | 01:22:38 | |
| Pereira Hugo | 2023 Bilbao | 01:22:44 | |
| Kirby Paul | 2023 London | 01:22:44 | |
| Lorenzen Arne | 2022 Essen | 01:22:55 | |
| Wilson Chris | 2023 London | 01:23:05 | |
| Collins John | 2021 New York | 01:23:18 | |
| Del Río García Fernando | 2021 Madrid | 01:22:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2018 Wien | 01:19:24 | |
| 2018 Essen | 01:21:02 | |
| 2019 Essen | 01:12:23 | |
| 2019 Leipzig | 01:17:42 | |
| 2019 Frankfurt | 01:20:11 | |
| 2018 Leipzig | 01:23:12 | |
| 2019 Oberhausen | 01:22:14 | |
| 2018 Hamburg | 01:20:53 | |
| 2019 Nürnberg | 01:26:05 | |
| 2019 Wien | 01:24:00 | |
| 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:25:51 | |
| 2023 Wien | 01:32:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
