Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 279 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Maltby Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Maltby Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Maltby Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Maltby Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:38 | 13:42 to 10:04 | 54.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:20 | 10:35 to 08:15 | 34.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:40 | 08:16 to 07:36 | 10.0% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:34 to 05:31 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:34 to 03:34 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:06 to 06:06 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 03:01 to 03:01 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 54:41 to 54:41 | 0.0% |
| Maltby Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:44 | 00:00 | 05:50 +00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 06:44 | 04:55 -00:17 | 05:50 +00:54 |
| Running 2 | 06:07 | 11:22 | 06:39 -00:32 | 10:45 +00:37 |
| Sled Push | 03:34 | 17:29 | 04:06 -00:32 | 17:24 +00:05 |
| Running 3 | 06:37 | 21:03 | 07:30 -00:53 | 21:30 -00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 06:06 | 27:40 | 07:14 -01:08 | 29:00 -01:20 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 33:46 | 07:25 -00:56 | 36:14 -02:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:35 | 40:15 | 08:38 +01:57 | 43:39 -03:24 |
| Running 5 | 07:01 | 50:50 | 07:47 -00:46 | 52:17 -01:27 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 57:51 | 05:35 -00:01 | 01:00:04 -02:13 |
| Running 6 | 06:37 | 01:03:25 | 07:34 -00:57 | 01:05:39 -02:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:01 | 01:10:02 | 02:56 +00:05 | 01:13:13 -03:11 |
| Running 7 | 06:52 | 01:13:03 | 07:42 -00:50 | 01:16:09 -03:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:16 | 01:19:55 | 08:08 +00:08 | 01:23:51 -03:56 |
| Running 8 | 08:18 | 01:28:11 | 09:40 -01:22 | 01:31:59 -03:48 |
| Wall Balls | 13:42 | 01:36:29 | 10:19 +03:23 | 01:41:39 -05:10 |
| Roxzone | 13:15 | 02:03:18 | 11:20 +01:55 | 02:03:18 |
Thomas Maltby, in the HYROX category of Age Group 30-34, demonstrated an impressive performance at the 2024 Birmingham event. Ranking in the top 64% of 4107 athletes overall, and within the top 67% of his age group, Thomas proved his abilities in both running and strength-based activities. His total running time of 00:54:41, which was 05:30 faster than the average, indicates a strong runner's profile. However, there are some segments where Thomas started slower than the average pace, such as Running 1 where he was slower by 01:02. This suggests a need to work on his pacing strategy to help improve his overall timing in the future.
Considering Thomas's performance, here are some strategies that can be implemented for an improved race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Justin | 2024 Manchester | 02:03:03 | |
| Mikkola Matias | 2024 Anaheim | 02:03:11 | |
| Dempsey Thomas | 2023 Dublin | 02:03:20 | |
| Mckirdy Steven | 2024 Glasgow | 02:03:42 | |
| Mulckhuijse Matthijs | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:03:04 | |
| Lee Jeffrey | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:03:34 | |
| Wong Chi Yuen | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:02:51 | |
| Löschinger Markus | 2019 Karlsruhe | 02:02:52 | |
| Walraven Joep | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:02:52 | |
| Carioscia Vincent | 2022 Chicago | 02:02:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
